Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 22 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

for every n>1, there is always a prime p: p < n < 2p. Is that true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u mean n<p<2n ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its Bertrand's postulate ... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand's_postulate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

its true and here is the proof http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_of_Bertrand's_postulate

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh, i don't know this. But, my original problem is prove that 1/2 + 1/3 + ... + 1/n is not an integer. Can you help me?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

this is an interesting problem though

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

@mukushla i have a confusion. for "2" How is Bertrand's postulate true?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2<3<4

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

but i have taken n=2

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

.....<2<......

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

see my first reply ... jean misstated that in her/his question

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

ohhh! thank u:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

jean i'v seen it before...let me provide some links for u ??

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, thank you very much.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

actually this is best http://plus.maths.org/content/perfect-harmony

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank you too, maheshmeghwal9

OpenStudy (maheshmeghwal9):

:D

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!