Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 19 Online
Parth (parthkohli):

Are standard basis vectors constant?

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

no, what do you mean

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

are vectors even important?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

or better yet...is Math important?

Parth (parthkohli):

In one of the examples, I noticed that they made a quick substitution for the following vectors:\[\overrightarrow{i} = \langle 0,0,1\rangle\]\[\overrightarrow{j} = \langle 0,1,0\rangle\]\[\overrightarrow k = \langle0,0,1\rangle\]So are vector i, vector j and vector k defined vectors?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

im thinking these are \(\hat i, \; \hat j, \; \hat k\) for some reason

Parth (parthkohli):

http://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/CalcII/VectorArithmetic.aspx "Standard Basis Vectors Revisited"

hartnn (hartnn):

i must be <1,0,0>

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

yes you are

Parth (parthkohli):

Oh yes,\[\overrightarrow{i} = \langle1,0,0\rangle\]Sorry... messed up

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

still thinking that's supposed to be \(\hat i\)

Parth (parthkohli):

OK, but is \(\hat{i}\) the same as \(\overrightarrow{i}\)?

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

\[\hat i = \; \text{positive x-axis}\]

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

no they are not

Parth (parthkohli):

OK

hartnn (hartnn):

and yes, i is defined as unit vector in x direction j is defined as unit vector in y direction k is defined as unit vector in z direction and denoted by i^ as said by lg

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

\[\vec i \implies \text{vector}\] \[\hat i \implies \text{vector component}\]

Parth (parthkohli):

I don't really get any of those, but thanks :P

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah... @hartnn that's right!

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

think of it somehow like this: i => x j => y k => z

Parth (parthkohli):

Yeah, I do!

OpenStudy (unklerhaukus):

\[\vec\imath=\langle 1,0,0\rangle\]\[\vec\jmath=\langle 0,1,0\rangle\]\[\vec k=\langle 0,0,1\rangle\]

OpenStudy (lgbasallote):

+ i => positive x-axis -i => negative x-axis + j => positive y-axis - j => negative y-axos k => positive z axis -k => negative z-axis

Parth (parthkohli):

That's a nice way to handle it! :)

hartnn (hartnn):

can u imagine a vector along x-direction and magnitude = 1.......thats i|dw:1347180055694:dw|

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!