Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 8 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Give the value of x where the function f(x)=[abs(x^2-1)]/[(x+1)(x-2)] has a removable discontinuity.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

These absolute value questions always trip me up.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Easy - removable dicont. is where technically there is a zero of denominator, but actually the term responsible for zero - is cancelled out....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The absolute value doesn't change how I would go about that at all?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I would automatically go to the answer being x=-1 if it were not for the absolute value bars.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Since, after factoring, I get [(x+1)(x-1)]/(x+1)(x-2)], then, after cancelling (x+1) in both the numerator and the denominator, I'm left with (x-1)/(x-2). But because of the absolute value, isn't there more to be done, or no?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

it is -1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

0/0 @x=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Look abs does NOT change ZEROs and ZERO-locations !

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@cuzzin suppose u didn't have abs - where is the removable d. ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

at x=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oookey now - does abs EVER create discontinuity for a continuous function ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No...right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeap.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Au-contraire - can abs "destroy" discontinuity which is REMOVABLE before its application

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Sometimes in class, when dealing with absolute values, the teacher will draw out the peacewise functions, like x<1 and x>1 and so on. Do you only do things like that in certain instances? Is that only when abs is in the denominator?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Concentrate on my questions please

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok. I'm going to say that abs can destroy discontinuity.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes it can destroy - but ONLY if it is NOT , that is if the "actuall value" which "should have been" is zero - abs CANNOT destroy the discont

OpenStudy (anonymous):

meant NOT ZERO

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well to cut to the chase : the discontinuity at zero of (x+1) which YOU CORRECTLY identified as x=-1 exists before and AFTER application of abs. This is tye removb. discont

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So would I be correct in just removing the absolute value bars and just proceeding with solving the problem as normal?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Nooo

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You should point out WHAT actually occurs at x=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which is a removable discontinuity I guess. Plugging (-1) directly in to the problem gives an indeterminant solution.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Argument is necessary why there is NO jump there

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok. Thanks for the help, I will try and get myself more caught up on all these discontinuities.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So Michael -- what exactly do you write as the reason?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@Mikael

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!