parametric plot of r(t) = (1+t, 3t, -t) ?
are you supposed to do it by hand somwhow?
somehow*
yes
I would find the vector then, and put this in vector form; that should make it more obvious
vector form of a line in R3 is r(t)=(a,b,c)+t(x,y,z) where (a,b,c) is the a point on the line and (x,y,z) is the direction vector
Are you supposed to tell what the graph of this is?
yeah
in your case it looks like you can use (a,b,c)=(1,0,0) and (x,y,z)=(1,3,-1) that tells you this is a line
Okay. So x = 1+t y = 3t And z = -t => Equating the parameter, y/3 = (x-1) = .-z
r(t)=(1,0,0)+t(1,3,-1)=(1+t,3t,-t)
What I need to do is to graph the vector in R3
the vector is (1,3,-1) so it is one in the +x, three in the +y, and 1 in the -z direction
Which as turningTest clearly said is the equation of a line Having direction ratio's (3,1,-1) And passing through 0,1,0
...passing through (1,0,0), but yeah...
Ohh yeah. My bad, 1,0,0 it is.
|dw:1347305677266:dw|here are your axes with P=(1,0,0) labeled, now draw in the vector...
|dw:1347305734982:dw|there are the vector components (the vector is not going to be easy to draw in 2D :/ )
|dw:1347305827025:dw|something like that (pointing a bit down in the z)
extending it as a line would be like|dw:1347305869065:dw|or something....
wolfram's drawing is not much clearer... http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=parametric+plot+r%28t%29%3D%281-t%2C3t%2C-t%29
Thats really hard to draw. You did it pretty damn well though.
thanks :)
Thank you very much!
welcome I should note you also could have just picked two values for t, like t=1 and t=0, and plot those on the grid, then draw a line between them good to know more than one way though ;)
(that would not work of each component was not linear though)
if*
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!