if a+b+c+d+e+f=1 then the maximum value of ab+bc+cd+de+ef . Given that a,b,c,d,e,f are positive...???
0
if none are negative then all must be 0 and a 1
for 0 .. hell no!! and they r not necessary integers..
\[ 3(a^2+b^2+c^2) \leq (a+b+c)^2 \leq 3 (ab+bc+ac) \] this might work
Woops!! \[ 3(a^2+b^2+c^2) \geq (a+b+c)^2 \geq 3 (ab+bc+ac) \]
is it 1?
I think it must be less than 1
\[ (a+ b+c+d+e+f)^2 \geq 3(ab+bc+cd ..\\+de+ef+fa) \geq 3(ab+bc+cd+de+ef) \] could be 1/3
a,b,c,d,e,f can any of them be 0?
not sure ... in that case 1/3 is the upper bound
1/4 ,,and am quite sure maybe ?
I also got 1/4 but I assumed except two all are zero.
exactly the same thing i did.. !!
WHAT DID U GET @shubhamsrg
well i didnt make much progress to be honest,,just 1/4 i got,,by putting 4 out of 6 =0 ,,and remaining then became = 1/2 each...
you can try the method of Lagrange multipliers if you like but this would be quite lengthy.
langrange gave me 1/8 as the solution,,not true,,ofcorse..
i won't try ...
the answer is 1/4 bt we need a mathematicaL proof.. we can take 2 no. to be approaching 1/2 and the rest all to be approaching 0 then the ans will approach zero...
unreachable
@Zekarias 1/4 is much much bigger than 5/36
(a+c+e)(b+d+f) less than (a+ b+...)/2 squared = 1/4 by AM/GM inequality.
It's easier once you have a target (ie 1/4)..
doesn't look like it has a maximum value
@estudier .... but (a+c+e)(b+d+f)=9 terms
As Zarkon says, you can only bound it. So 6 terms still less than 9 terms, right..?
yes thats right ... so supremum of the expression being 1/4
Yes, I sort of did it backwards when I saw the 1/4...
what about the extra 4 terms wont they increase its value..
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!