Rewrite the following definition as a biconditional: Points that lie on the same line are collinear.
Do you know how to write "Points that lie on the same line are collinear." in the If, then" format?
yeah
So how would it read? What we need to do is to get P->Q and then its converse to form the biconditional.
"if points lie on the same line, then they are collinear" tada lol
P: if points lie on the same line q:then they are collinear That's p>q Okay, how would the converse of p->q be written?
thats what i dont know :/
wait does it go " if they are collinear then the points are on the same line"?
The converse of p-> q is q ->p. Look above where I wrote the designations for p and q. Then, write If the q part, the the p part. That would be the converse.
Definition: A biconditional statement is defined to be true whenever both parts have the same truth value. The biconditional operator is denoted by a double-headed arrow . The biconditional p<->q represents "p if and only if q," where p is a hypothesis and q is a conclusion.
wait does it go " if they are collinear then the points are on the same line"? ------------ YES, that's correct. Read the definition of biconditonal and we can wrap up this problem.
Note on "if they are collinear then the points are on the same line"?" Not only is it the correct form of the converse, it is a true statement as is the original statement. So .... it's a biconditional.
k
Biconditional Form: Points on the same line <--> ? You add the second part.
are collinear
Points on the same line <--> collinear points. That's how I would phrase it.
thanks for your help! :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!