Ask your own question, for FREE!
Physics 19 Online
OpenStudy (amistre64):

Object sliding down a ramp .... PE and KE

OpenStudy (amistre64):

|dw:1348751150306:dw|

OpenStudy (amistre64):

oh, and time it takes to slide to the bottom of the ramp is 1.638 seconds Potential energy = .0025*9.8*.46 Kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp is?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

this problem involves friction

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think we can use work-kinetic energy theorem.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

hopefully :) I seem to come up with 2 different answers; and i know one of them is wrong.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The aceleration must be constant right?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[a=\frac{2d}{t^2}\] \[v=at=\frac{2d}{t}\] \[K_e=\frac12mv^2\] energy lost to friction \[P_e-K_e\]

OpenStudy (amistre64):

assume a constant acceleration yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You're did it correct i think

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you know the co-efficient of sliding friction?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

not outright; but that can be calculated with given information i believe

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Hmm, actually we don't need \(\mu\) since time is known.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mmm true.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

\[\mu_k=\frac{g~sin\theta-a}{g~cos\theta}\] \[F_k=\mu_k*\vec n=\frac{g~sin\theta-a}{g~cos\theta}*mg~cos\theta\] \[F_k=m(g~sin\theta-a)\] \[W_f=F_k*d=md~(g~sin\theta-a)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

hey you know that v=2d/t^2. So KE is just 1/2 mv^2.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i mean, what else do you want?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

just working it thru a couple of ways. When I first tried to work this out; I used: Pe = mgh = 0.01127 J in a frictionless system; Ke = Pe at the bottom of the ramp mgh = mv^2/2 gh = v^2/2 sqrt(2gh) = v v = 3.0027 m/s right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The problem maybe 1.638 sec isn't the correct time :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, v=3m/s in that case.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

its pretty good, we slid the penny 5 times and averaged it out

OpenStudy (amistre64):

at first the velocity of the Ke i just worked out threw me for a loop

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you actually measured 3m/s!?

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i couldnt see why the velocity from v=2d/t wasnt matching up :)

OpenStudy (amistre64):

the 3 m/s was not measured, it was calculated

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i thought you performed an experiment with a penny..

OpenStudy (amistre64):

i spose my question is; is using the velocity of 2d/t a proper way to determine the kinetic energy in the system at the bottom of the ramp?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes. This works no matter what the friction is (even 0).

OpenStudy (amistre64):

thanks :) so if it was a frictionless system, then the kinetic energy at the bottom of the ramp would still equal the potential energy from the start of it; and all that would change is the final velocity of the object then.

OpenStudy (amistre64):

..and a change in time, but thats a given :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Here's a nice video of an extreme case where the object slides with uniform velocity: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=84DXjumAxNQ&feature=plcp

OpenStudy (amistre64):

lol, great; i minute ten watching a sock slide down a banister ....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!