y= x^2 + 4x +3/ sqrt x
What do you need to do with that?
oh sorry differentiate the function
Ok, do you remember the differentiation rules?
Yeah I know the quotient rule.
Great. As that is a sum (the easier case), you can split it intro 3 parts and differentiate them separately.
I got to here and was stuck. I was shown how to get the answer, but I dont understand how they did part of it.
heres what I have, (sqrtx)(2x+4)-(x^2+4+3) 1/2x^-1/2
over (sqrtx)^2
those square roots are what is confusing me I dont know what to do with them.
i changed the one on the far right hand side to 1/2 x^-1/2 so I could use the derivative
To make it easier you can think of them as (something)^1/2. Then you can differentiatie it as if it was a power.
right. but after I do that im lost
When you have to differentiate\[3. (x)^{\frac{-1}{2}}\]?
That is where you get lost?
well yes. because that last square root you have to take the derivative. but after that, I dont know what to do. or at least the explanation in the book doesnt make any sense.
i wish i could take a picture of the answer the book gives and show you so you can explain it
It would be:\[3 . \frac{-1}{2} . (x)^\frac{-3}{2} . x \prime\] Which you can rewrite as \[\frac{-3}{2} . \frac{ 1 }{ \sqrt[3]{x^2}}\]
ok can you write this whole thing out? i apologize but I need to see the whole thing worked through to get it.
Sure. \[y = x^2 + 4x + \frac{3}{\sqrt{x}}\] So \[y \prime = (x^2)\prime + (4x)\prime + (\frac{3}{\sqrt{x}})\prime\] Because it is a sum, right?
before you get to far into this, you know there is a sqrt x in the denominator, right?
Oh, like this? \[y = \frac{x^2 + 4x + 3}{\sqrt{x}}\]
correct. I apply the quotient rule, and then I get stuck
\[y \prime = \frac{(x^2+4x+3)\prime . \sqrt{x} - (x^2+4x+3) . \sqrt{x}\prime }{\sqrt{x}^2}\]
good so far. after this is when I get wonky \
So far you're good, right?
correct
Ok, let's take it by pieces so it's easier for you to see.
The sum is a nice one to differenciate, because you can split it into even smaller parts. \[(x^2+3x+3)\prime = 2x + 3 + 0\]
You're good with that one?
yup
you mean 4x right?
Cool. Now let's go with the nasty square root.
Ups, yeah. My bad there!
no worries please continue
Ok, so the little trick with the square roots, or any root, is to think of them as a power, right?
Because you already have a rule to differentiate X to some power, and it's relatively easy...
x^1/2 right
Right. So applying the same method you get: \[y \prime = (x^\frac{-1}{2})\prime = \frac{-1}{2} . X^{\frac{1}{2} - 1}\]
1/2x^-1/2 right
That is the same: \[y \prime = \frac{-1}{2} X^{\frac{-3}{2}}\]
Yep, there's a minus missing.
I'm awful with this editor.
wait why is it -1/2?
if sqrtx is x^-1/2, how does it become -1/2x^-1/2?
I made a mistake again. xD You're totally right
It's a positive 1/2
well at least im paying attention. so its 1/2x^-1/2 right?
\[y \prime = \frac{1}{2}X^{\frac{-1}{2}}\]
ok. after this is where im stuck
Now you can leave as it is, or you can change it back into a square root. And then plug it into the big quotient rule.
\[y \prime = \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} = \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}\]
That's all the differentiation done. You just have to plug it in and make it look nice. :P
so its sqrtx(2x+4)-(x^2+4x+3)-1/2sqrtx ?
over sqrtx^2?
\[y \prime = \frac{(2x+4) . \sqrt{x} - (x^2 + 4x + 3) . \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{x}}} {x}\]
Exactly
wait so the sqrtx and the sqrtx^2 cancel?
\[y \prime = \frac{(2x+4)\sqrt{x} - {(x^2 + 4x + 3)}}{x 2\sqrt{x}}\]
Yes. Actually, you should put a module there.
im still lost. where did the numerator 1/2sqrtx go?
\[y \prime = \frac{(2x+4)\sqrt{x} - (x^2 + 4x +3)}{|x| 2\sqrt{x}}\]
To the denominator.
so they canceled?
No, it's stil there.
When you multiply by 1 over something, it is the same as dividing by that something.
So you can just put it in the denominator and it won't affect the result.
oh right
I hope I didn't confuse you more than you were. With my typos and all...
so what happened to the sqrtx^2 in the denominator?
You could leave it like that if you want to. But also you can simplify it by writing it as module of X.
If you take any number, square it, and then take the square root it is the same as if you just grabbed that number and made it always positive.
If it's easier for you, you can always leave it as the square root squared. It's not wrong.
ok. what does it look like now?
Check above, the last formula. That would be the final result.
Do you get it or you still have doubts?
well its not the right answer so yeah I still am confused. dont worry about it. im just going to ask the professor monday.
What does the answer say?
Is it much different?
3x^2+4x-3/2x^3/2
Oh, that's probably the result after distributing the square root of X in the numerator and then doing the division.
In the denominator if you multiply the 2 square root of X squared by X you get the 2 . (x)^3/2
yeah im still lost. im just going to move on.
Yeah, take a look at it later. But it's probably a different notation, if you got the quotient rule then you could do it just fine.
im not so sure. my algebra is pretty weak.
Don't worry, you'll get it. It's just a matter of practice. Then it becomes pretty mechanical.
well this is my third time taking calculus and its still hard as hell. maybe its the adhd.
I totally get it, I took it twice, too. But perseverance is everything in this stuff. Don't give up.
wasnt planning on it. just frustrated
getting tired of studying for hours on end and getting crappy grades
Right. It sucks.
But sometimes it comes a time where you magically start understanding.
well anytime would be great. im wasting money here.
And you are like "Wow! I can't believe it was that easy"
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!