Prove #3(The integers 1,..., 2n are arranged in any order on 2n places numbered 1,..., 2n. Now we add its place number to each integer. Prove that there are two among the sums which have the same remainder mod 2n.:
http://midcitiesmathcircle.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/math_circle_invariants.pdf
Hint: read the title
i bet it is pigeon hole
That is part of it
sort of
slightly
but don't base your proof off of it
Another Hint: think about the sums of the numbers and the sums of the places (mod 2n)
do u know the answer?
Yes
dont u use contradiction?
Yes
\[s _{1} = 2(1+2+...+2n)=(2n+1) =0\]??
=2n(2n+1) = 0 i mean
If by that you mean that the sum of the bases and numbers (mod 2n) is congruent to 0, then yes
so u want the sum of the remainders?
well, that is the invariant: \[0+1+2+...+2n-2+2n-1 = n (\mod 2n)\]
therefore: \[2(0+1+2+...+2n-2+2n-1) = 0 (\mod 2n)\]
now what would it mean if no two sums had the same remainder (mod 2n)?
no idea. actually all the sudden i feel feverish and have a headache haha
|dw:1349670919492:dw|
|dw:1349671006177:dw|
this is descrete mathematics?
|dw:1349671030624:dw|
therefore:|dw:1349671122739:dw|:
Now, if no 2 numbers have the same remainder (mod 2n). we have:|dw:1349671199984:dw|
*sum of number and place
not number alone
Therefore, some numbers must have the same remainder
:)
Quantum Electro Dynamics
Also just realized that I typoed contradiction...
i still think it is pigeon hole
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 8, 9, 10, 1, 7, 2, 6, 3, 5, 4 9, 11, 13, 5, 12, 8, 13, 11, 14, 14 ------> SUMS Now I see only one remainder 9 when divided by 10 to all sums
But that isn't the thing we are trying to prove
We are just proving that at least 2 of them have the same remainder
oh........ I got it now.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!