Given: LM=MN Prove: LM(Segment) is congruent to MN (segment)
Need both indirect and direct prooof
and a diagram :)
Should i make a diagram... cuz there isnt one
I mean a pic or drawing of the figure.
oh..... idk im supposed to do both direct and indirect proofs'
the direct proof is Given: LM=MN <-this Prove: LM(Segment) is congruent to MN (segment) It is odd because we dont even know what kind of figure you mean. Is it a triangle?
hm.... i dont think so i think they are lie segments like M could be the midpoint or something
well there are a lot of probabilities i am stuck here lol.
just do the midpoint thingy make our life eaiser -_-
well using this definition http://www.icoachmath.com/math_dictionary/Indirect_Proof.html LM=MN given 2LM not= 2MN not= LM+MN Something like that right?
If LM=MN then 2LM= 2MN = LM + MN and 2LM not= 2MN not= LM+MN would be an inpossibility.
HMM,,,,,O.o im confused
Bro, draw it!
.... OKAY
Um, isn't it just given?
|dw:1349719096772:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!