what is a sphere made up of? A. two flat surface and one curved surface b. circular cross section c. two curved surfaces and a flat curface d. the great circle
\[\circ\]
Imagine a sphere and try to find those features on/in it.
a
Dodgy question, is this topology, differential topology or what? (It's clearly not b or d)
its A
two flat surface and one curved surface
I heard you the first time
@nana458
i thought a would make a cylinder
No its a
hold up
ok its b
ok thank you
yea No problem
why not b @estudier
even i thought b
A is false @ObeyChris{~}
I don't think the question is asking for the entire make-up of a sphere, just a particular feature. A sphere does have a great circle, but it has other circles as well.
I already corrected myself and said its b u idiot so dont mention my name on anything
@ObeyChris{~} I didn't notice your correction. I don't think that is sufficient for me to be an idiot
@ObeyChris{~} sorry also for mentioning your name.
@ObeyChris{~} sorry again for mentioning your name again. ;-)
u good
I'll accept that as an apology for calling me an "idiot." Thank you.
yea and i apologize for callin u a idiot
i think we can rule out A, and c. because a sphere does not have three surfaces
and one can think of a sphere as a(n infinite) sum of (infinitesimal) circular cross-sections, the largest of which are great circles
As far as I am concerned, a sphere has 1 curved surface and that isn't an option, so I am satisfied with what I said to begin with, dodgy question.....
a sphere made up of circular cross-sections
Maybe, but that is not an option.
what do you think the most likely option is @estudier
I think the question is misconceived @UnkleRhaukus
I would also like the original poster to answer my question.
i agree that in the exact wording , none of the answers make sense
Maybe they didn't mean sphere but something else. Or maybe there is another option, I don't know.
The best option still remains that a sphere has a circular cross-section. That is true and general enough.
Nobody is denying that a sphere has a circular cross section. The question says that a sphere IS made up of a circular cross section, false.
Why can't you make a sphere out of circular cross-sections?
The question doesn't say that, either.
The question is worded poorly, but I think it has a meaning analogous to "What is the human body made up of?" and one of the options is "water." That is true, water is a constituent part of the human body, so it is made up of it (not entirely, but at least in part. Some implicit reasoning is always required when interpreting the meaning of linguistic phrases.
Not worded poorly, just a rubbish question (perhaps the poster has not transcribed it properly, who knows?)
I think it wouldn't be unreasonable to reword the question as, "What could you make a circle from?" (a) and (c) are still ruled out of course, and (d) remains viable if you consider a rotation of the great circle until it describes the entire sphere, but stacking up infinite circular cross-sections (including those degenerate circles called points) will make up a sphere.
All well and good but now you are just rewriting the question to suit the answer. Which is a pov, but I prefer to answer the question asked.
If it is a multiple-choice question, and we reasonably assume that one of the choices is correct, what process do you use to make the best guess?
I can also assume that the poster has transcribed it incorrectly or the question is just a mistake. It is not my job to make assumptions, that is the job of the person who posted the question.
I agree, but put yourself in the shoes of the person asking the question. What if you saw this question on a quiz, and you weren't allowed to ask anybody for help; the clock is ticking and you just want to make a guess and move on. What would you guess to be the correct answer?
This is just hypothetical, I am not in that position so I cannot speculate on what I would do. I might cross it all out and write "This is wrong" next to it.... Or mark every answer correct Or mark none correct Or come back to it later if I had time Or waste time thinking about what it might mean....
What if it was an online test (as are common these days, and there is no 'crossing out' or the ability to mark every answer? It's a situation where you have to make your best guess at what the question means to answer it and move on. I wouldn't recommend wasting time thinking about what it means, an answer has to be given, and a course grade depends on it. Would you guess at random because you didn't like the phrasing of the question, or would you increase your odds by reinterpreting the question in a form that makes more sense given the answer choices. I understand your philosophy of not assuming what is meant and to only go with what is given, and to call a poorly-posed question a poorly posed question. I agree completely with that philosophy, but as one who is trying to help others answer questions, I want to give them all the tools available, including thinking about the questions in different ways.
More hypotheticals and more philosophy, I'm afraid. Your argument boils down to recommending to the original poster that he (possibly) give a wrong answer to a problematic question. My argument boils down to "It's not my problem" and it isn't.
in multi-choice, choose the best answer
Or don't waste time with nonsense and just move on...:-)
multichoice is usually nonsense but that dosent mean i can avoid it if i wish to achieve my goals
"multichoice is usually nonsense" -says who? How does wasting time with nonsense help you to achieve your goals?
well the university will give a bit of paper that will make it easier to get into the career i would like, multi-choice is not something that will be a component of my career
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!