What's wrong with my Gaussing?
Infinite uniformly negatively charged plate ( \[density= \sigma \] ) placed on top of a uniformly charged solid slab going infinitely sideways and with depth D. Work out E field IN the slab. 1st Gauss surface: cylinder, cross-sectional area A, with both ends outside the system. Flux through the cylinder is \[ \frac{Q}{\epsilon_0} =\frac{\rho DA- \sigma A}{\epsilon_0} \], so the flux through the top end is\[ \frac{\rho DA- \sigma A}{2\epsilon_0} \] 2nd Gauss surface: shift the bottom end of the cylinder to be h above the bottom of the slab (i.e. still below much of the slab and the surface). Flux through the surface is now \[ \frac{\rho (D-h)A- \sigma A}{\epsilon_0} \] So flux through the bottom surface is [ \frac{\rho (D-h)A- \sigma A}{\epsilon_0}- \frac{\rho DA- \sigma A}{2\epsilon_0}\] From this work out E field \[ Flux=E \cdot A \] \[\frac{\rho (D-h)A- \sigma A}{\epsilon_0}- \frac{\rho DA- \sigma A}{2\epsilon_0}=EA \] \[\frac{\rho (D-h)- \sigma }{\epsilon_0}- \frac{\rho D- \sigma }{2\epsilon_0}=E \]
\[ E= \frac{\rho D- 2\rho h-\sigma}{2\epsilon_0} outwards\]
|dw:1349894996886:dw|
I'm not so much interested with the answer or real method as much as where I went wrong.
you picked a surface that has different values of E on it.
|dw:1349974776038:dw| Is this true?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!