Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

The horizontal tangent lines of f(x) occur at which x-values?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[f(x)=\frac{ \sqrt{2x-1} }{ x }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got x=2/3

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Did you take first derivative then set that equal to zero?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes. I only made the numerator equal to 0

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I got 2/3 and 0 but 0 can't be an option because it is not in the domain of f(x)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That all seems to check out. I'm going to try graphing it just to be sure, but I think you did everything fine here.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

:)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

The graph is showing something different. You might want to double-check everything. It looks a little funny, so might take some triple-checking too.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ruh roh.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ah, I think I may have seen where we both made an error. Look where you need chain rule on (2x-1)^(1/2)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

f'(x) = \[\frac{ \frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \times (2x-1)^{-2/3} \times 2 \times x-(2x-1)^{1/2}}{ x ^{2} }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I just made that top portion equal to 0. so \[\frac{ x }{ \sqrt[3]{(2x-1)^{2}}} - \sqrt{2x-1}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I found a common denominator.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Why (2x-1)^(-2/3) ?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh woops

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I meant ^-1/2 :P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ya. Maybe try \[\large f(x) = (2x-1)^{1/2} \cdot x^{-1}\] and using product rule to verify?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(I trip up using quotient rule too often. Product rule seems less prone to error)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok. so \[\frac{ 1 }{ 2 } \times (2x-1)^{\frac{ -1 }{ 2 }} \times 2 \times x ^{-1}+ (-x ^{-2})(2x-1)^{\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That should simplify a little cleaner. Yes, solve that =0.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\frac{ 1 }{ x(2x-1)^{\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }} }+\frac{ (2x-1)^{\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }} }{ x ^{2} }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok so

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\frac{ 1 }{ x(2x-1)^{\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }} }=-\frac{ (2x-1)^{\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }} }{ x ^{2} }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[1=\frac{ 2x-1 }{ x }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[x=2x-1\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-x=-1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

x=1?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's one way of looking at it, yes. That should work out...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

bah ok.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, because, as you said, x=0 is not in the domain.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, looks like we both made the same error at first. I got 2/3 too, but then went back and saw I forgot to multiply by 2 somewhere. *shrug* Got to be patient with this stuff. Haste makes waste and all that.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Well thanks!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

arithmetic is my arch nemesis.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Any time. I just told someone a couple minutes ago, "The hardest part about Calculus is the algebra." Now I get to say, "The hardest part about algebra is the arithmetic." :-P

OpenStudy (anonymous):

haha. you told me that.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh yeah, on Steel11's implicit differentiation question. X-D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

mhmm

OpenStudy (anonymous):

And you know what? I remind myself of this pretty often, "The hardest part about arithmetic is the counting." Grrr, the counting! Messes me up every time!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Someone should come up with, I don't know, mathematics, to make all this counting easier! ..... Oh, right.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

psh.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I want to go back to the old days and use a handy dandy abacus

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!