Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

2x = 400 9

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Start with \[\large A=Pe^{rt}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not quite. There was an error in your solving.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

2=e^rt ln 2 = rt

OpenStudy (anonymous):

How did you get that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I don't think simple interest applies here. That wouldn't require logarithms. 7.2 percent is close to what I got. Did you round off anywhere along the way?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

7.2 is a good approximation using the rule of 72, but it is less precise than using the exponential formula.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Not using logarithms. How did you get the 7.2? Did you use the t=72/r approximation?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Ok, that's good, that gives a good estimate, but to be more precise, use the exponential. \[\large A=Pe^{rt}\] A=8000, P=4000, t=10 A/P=2 \[\large \rightarrow 2=e^{10r}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Taking the natural log of both sides: \[\large ln(2) = 10r \rightarrow r=\frac{ln(2)}{10}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, P=4000

OpenStudy (anonymous):

No, you need to solve 2=e^rt, which has been solved to get r=ln(2)/10. You need to evaluate ln(2)/10 to get a value for r.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

That's better. (or even 6.93%) See how that is close to the 7.2% estimate?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!