Why is C+O2=> CO2 instead of 2CO?
because there isnt 2 carbons on the left side of the equation
But here's how I did it; First, the equation was C+ O2. C has the opposite charge of whatever O has, and O is a -2, which means C has a charge of +2. So it ends up being CO and to balance it out, it becomes 2C+O2=> 2CO @Sheng
but your equation states there are 2 oxygens, and only 1 carbon meaning it can only form CO2 to balance
if there were 2C + O2 then it would yield 2CO
But doesn't it depend on the charges?
and just an extra piece of information, burning carbon yields CO2 99% of the time, carbon monoxide is only produced during incomplete combustion
carbon only can exist in +4 or -4 state
What about Fe+S8? I used the same method I did with C+O2, and got the correct answer
why would it be written as S8?
are you implying there are 8 sulfurs bonded together?
Yes @Sheng
Sulfur is always written as S8 and phosphorus is written as P4
S8 = octasulfur, i've never dealt with this compound before
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!