What is the Least Common Denominator? Screenshot attached!
Its 2
Oh sry dont have time...
Haha sorry
In the second term on the left, x^2 - 4 can be factored into (x + 2) and (x - 2)
(x-2)*(x+2)
:D
yes
x^2-4=(x+2)(x-2) on the other hand you have (x+2) so you need to multiply den and num by (x-2)
so you get it
\[x^2-4\] is the least common multiple of your denominators
I'm here and can help.
Just multiply the first term on the left by (x-2) / (x-2). Leave that factor in both the numerator and the denominator for now and then put the "+" and the second term on the left. For that second term on the left, factor out the denominator as in my previous post.
explanation is the that \[x^2-4=(x^2-4)\times 1\] \[x^2-4=(x+2)(x-2)\] \[x^2-4=(x-2)(x+2)\] so it is a multiple of each denominator therefore the easy way to solve this equation is to multiply each side by \(x^2-4\) so clear the fractions
Your new numerator on the left will be a COMBINED numerator of 3(x-2) + 12.
x²-4 = (x+2)(x-2) so the least common denominator
is x²-4
Once you simplify the new COMBINED numerator, gotten by using the least common denominator, you can factor the new numerator and one of the factors in the denominator will cancel.
\[(x^2-4)\times \left(\frac{3}{x+2}+\frac{12}{x^2-4}\right)=\frac{-1}{x-2}\times (x^2-4)\]
3(x-2) + 12 will become 3x + 6 which will become 3(x + 2) and that second factor will cancel.
\[3(x-2)+12=-1(x+2)\] after cancelling solve for \(x\) now is easier
I jumped in because others left for a while. If you want to use LCM, better to use my method as it illustrates LCM more straightforward. Other helper's methods here are a little different from mine, so you pick who you want to listen to at this point. The important thing is that you get the concept, so you are free to choose.
@tcarroll010 ?
You're sort of on the right track, more on than off. I think it is best that I start you over a little bit. BTW, loved your "last man standing", though not exactly a confidence-booster! The problem is really two-fold. You are asked to get LCD, but you have an equation, which is actually solved for you already. The underlying purpose for this is to see how they got the answer (the right-hand side). So, I'll post some stuff for you to consider.
[3(x-2)] / [(x+2)(x-2)] + 12 / [(x+2)(x-2)] is the left side. x^2 - 4 is the LCD and I also factored that out in the second term at the same time.
I'm floating now. All is peachy.
This is fun because you have personality. Yes, I would suggest this as a "starting over" so you don't have to read and re-read. Simpler is better.
For the COMBINED numerator, 3(x - 2) + 12 = 3x - 6 +12 = 3x + 6 = 3(x + 2) and THAT is the second trick to this problem. The first was getting the LCD. From that point, you can cancel out the (x+2) from the numerator and the denominator.
Getting the LCD and simplifying the left side is one thing. Once you have that, then we need to talk about the equality and the right side.
x first must be different of 2 and -2 3/x+2 + 12/x²-4 = -1/x-2 =>[ 3(x-2)+12]/x²-4 = -1(x+2)/x²-4 we eliminate x²-4 on each side and we got 3(x-2)+12 = -x-2 so 3x-6+12=-x-2 then 4x=-8 so x=-2 IMPOSSIBLE this equation has no solution ; cause x must not be 2 or -2
we can never devide by 0 in maths
Aylen33, I was getting to that, but step-by-step so as not to just give the answer to the student. The students have to show some work here.
oh yah sorry for that may be she will just get the method first ;)
Once you simplify the left-hand side, you will end up with the strange-looking 3 / (x - 2) = (-1) / (x-2). These two expressions on either side of the "=" sign have the same denominator, so we need only look to the numerator to test the equality. Notice anything strange?
wow this is a lot of work
Aylen333 brought up a good point about what are acceptable values for x when looking at the denominator of the LCD, but that becomes secondary as the "equality" is just a nonsense statement. However, the question just asked for finding the LCD. Discovering that the "=" doesn't hold is just a result of further investigation.
So, even though the equality doesn't hold, we just have to settle for having found the LCD, which is what the denominator of the second term on the left is. And then we're done, and don't really have to try to "solve".
So, in a nutshell, x^2 - 4 is LCD and that's it.
greeting from north africa
Sometimes we make things more complicated when we don't have to. But sometimes it is good to take things "a step further", like here to see if there is a solution.
So, all good now?
For the other helpers, thanks for pitching in. @satellite73 , your method was good but needed to mention that x = -2 won't work, because you multiplied that out of the denominator when in reality it has to be "checked" for allowable values.
Same with x = 2.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!