Is this a valid mathematical sentence?\[\rm f:3\mapsto 9 ~where~f(x) = x^2 \]
i can read it, so its prolly not ;)
Is this a better way to write it?\[\rm f:x\mapsto x^2 \implies f:3\mapsto9 \]
nope
That's invalid notation.\[(f=x\mapsto x^2)\implies(f(3)=9)\]
f:{3} to {9}, x maps to x^2 is a function definition (to which u may sometimes add the codomain as well).
any function is defined over sets if you enclose the 3 and 9 in parenthesis and say "this set is my domain and the other one is my co-domain", then its fine
it can also be f(x) = 3x we can write in many ways we can not derive a function from a single relation
What I want to write is: 3 maps to 9 in the function f(x) = x^2
What'd be a rather good way to do so?
write f(3)=9
No, I'm trying to use much of the mapping symbol to get the hang of it.
f:{3}->{9} such that f(x)=x^2
Use Arrow Diagram
f: Set to ( arrow) Set, x maps to (arrow with tail) f(x) defines a function.
?
So\[\rm f:3\mapsto9|f(x) = x^2\]
|dw:1350666512498:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!