what is a highest common factor
\[\frac{ 1 }{ 2 }-\frac{ 1 }{ 3 }=\frac{ 1 }{ 5 }\]
of 2,3,5
suppose \[x,y,z\] are positive intergers satisfying the equation \[\frac{ 1 }{ x }-\frac{ 1 }{ y}=\frac{ 1 }{ z }\] and let \[h\] be the highest common factorof x,y,z. Prove that hxyz is a perfect square
HELP
Is "hxyz" just the product of those variables? Sorry, your opening post made me think you were talking about common denominators... a much simpler question, obviously.
yes hxyz is a product
multiplying gives \[yz-xz-xy=0\]
\[h=xyz\]
\[\frac{ 1 }{ x }-\frac{ 1 }{ y }-\frac{ 1 }{ z }=0\]\[\frac{ zy-zx-xy }{ xyz }=0\]
@cwrw238 @dpaInc
I'm doing the same stuff as you on paper... not making too much progress. you might multiply top and bottom by h to at least get the denominator in the final form of hxyz, but I don't know where that would lead.
I thought about creating some x = hx' type of dummy variables to try to incorporate h as the greatest common factor... didn't know where to take that either, since I just ended up with x', y', and z' added in the mix.
1 is the highest common factor of 2,3,5
you mean every product 4,5,6 : 7,8,6 1 is gdc,i dnt think so
@PaxPolaris @amistre64
\[\frac{xyz}{1}\left(\frac{ 1 }{ x }-\frac{ 1 }{ y}=\frac{ 1 }{ z }\right)\] \[yz-xz=xy\] \[z(y-x)=xy\] \[z=\frac{xy}{y-x}\] and im assuming x,y,z not equal 0 to begin with since they are all bottom numbers
\[\frac{ 1 }{ x }-\frac{ 1 }{ y}=\frac{ 1 }{ xy/y-x }\] \[\frac{ 1 }{ x }-\frac{ 1 }{ y}=\frac{y-x }{ xy }\] \[\frac{ y-x }{ xy }=\frac{y-x }{ xy }\] pfft, well that might have been the wrong track to take :)
but what does h mean and can we incoperate it in to the equation
gdc(x,y,z)=h
hmm, good point. are we to assume that all these are integer values? are any spose to be positive only? and what is this twisted term "highest common factor"?
the next question goes like prove that \[h(y-z)\]. they are all positive intergers
earlier when you typed h = xyz, was that some definition of h, or something you derived from somewhere? if h is a greatest common factor, for the case of 1/2 - 1/3 = 1/5, the GCF of those three primes is 1, making h = 1, but 1*2*3*5 = 30, which is not a perfect square. So for that definition of h, this cannot be proved due to this counterexample.
i made a mistake the gdc is not equal to xyz h is not =xzy
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!