Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 7 Online
OpenStudy (agentnao):

Derivative of a log in the denominator.

OpenStudy (agentnao):

\[\frac{ 1 }{ \log _{2}x }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you know change of base formula?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\(\frac{d}{dx}\frac{1}{f}=-\frac{f'}{f^2}\)

OpenStudy (agentnao):

Yikes. I learned it last year, but I don't remember it :/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

in your case, \(f(x)=\log_2(x), f'(x)=\frac{1}{x\ln(2)}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

guess you can use change of base as well right? \[\log_2(x)=\frac{\ln(x)}{\ln(2)}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

making your function \[\frac{1}{\log_2(x)}=\frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(x)}\] you will get the same thing when you take the derivative, and don't forget that \(\ln(2)\) is just a constant, so DO NOT go and use the quotient rule

OpenStudy (agentnao):

And then the derivative of ln(x) is 1/x? Or do I need the chain rule for that?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, but don't forget your log is in the denominator

OpenStudy (agentnao):

So then the x is moved to the numerator, yes?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

when i said do not use the quotient rule i meant use this \[\left(\frac{1}{f}\right)'=\frac{-f'}{f^2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

how do you want to write your function? as \[f(x)=\frac{1}{\log_2(x)}\] or as \[f(x)=\frac{\ln(2)}{\ln(x)}\]? maybe we should just stick with the first one

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for the first one, you just need the derivative of \(\log_2(x)\) which is \(\frac{1}{x\ln(2)}\) put that in the numerators, put \((\log_2(x))^2\) in the denominator, and put a minus sign in front of the whole thing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you get \[-\frac{\frac{1}{x\ln(2)}}{(\log_2(x))^2}\] and you can simplify with some algebra to get \[-\frac{1}{(\log_2(x))^2x\ln(2)}\]

OpenStudy (agentnao):

\[\frac{ 300 }{ 1+2^{4-t} }\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i take it this is another question right?

OpenStudy (agentnao):

This equation models the spread of a rumor at a school where t is the number of days after the rumor first started to spread. And yes! It is :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

they really stretch for these word problems don't they "model for a rumor" indeed

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what are you supposed to answer?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i means does it just ask for the derivative, or is there some part to the question

OpenStudy (agentnao):

Estimate the initial number of students who first heard the rumor. An.d then they want how fast the rumor was spreading after 4 days

OpenStudy (anonymous):

initial number means when you start counting, so replace \(t\) by \(0\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then take the derivative, evaluate at \(t=4\)

OpenStudy (agentnao):

For the first part, I just plug in 1 for t right? And then for the second part, I think I need the derivative?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

no for the first part you plug in 0 for t, not 1

OpenStudy (anonymous):

again for the derivative, the denominator will be \((1+2^{4-t})^2\) the numerator will be \(300\times 2^{4-t}\times \ln(2)\)

OpenStudy (agentnao):

Why thought? Why do you square the denominator and multiply it on top too?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the derivative of \(1+2^{4-t}\) is \(2^{4-t}\ln(2)\times (-1)\) by the chain rule that \(-1\) is what makes the numerator positive

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you square the denominator, multiply by minus the derivative of the denominator on top

OpenStudy (anonymous):

again the derivative of \(\frac{1}{f}\) is \(\frac{-f'}{f^2}\) in your case \(f(x)=1+2^{4-t},f'(t)=-2^{4-t}\ln(2)\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

so your "final answer" for the derivative works out to \[\frac{300\times \ln(2)\times 2^{4-t}}{(1+2^{4-t})^2}\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

replacing \(t\) by 4 gives an easy calculation since both exponents are zero

OpenStudy (agentnao):

Wait...I'm sorry for not getting this after you explained it so nicely. Can you show me one more time how/why you are getting \[-2^{4-t} \ln2\]? You said you used the chain rule for this?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

sure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

but first it is good to know that the derivative of \(b^x\) is \(b^x\ln(b)\) you good with that one ?

OpenStudy (agentnao):

OH MY GOD. I completely forgot that rule....WOW. That explains why you were getting that answer!! Argh. I'm so sorry. Yes, I understand what you are doing now.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok good, then it should be easy right? the derivative of \(2^t\) is \(2^t\ln(2\) but the derivative of \(2^{4-t}\) is \(2^{4-t}\ln(2)\times (-1)\) because we have to take the derivative of \(4-t\) by the chain rule

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that is why the numerator of your derivative is \[300\ln(2)2^{4-t}\] because of the minus sign in the rule for reciprocals and the other minus sign from the chain rule above

OpenStudy (anonymous):

your last job is to take \[\frac{300\times \ln(2)\times 2^{4-t}}{(1+2^{4-t})^2}\] and replace \(t\) by \(4\) you get \[\frac{300\ln(2)}{4}\]

OpenStudy (agentnao):

You are magnificent. You've taught me so much in the few minutes that we've been exchanging comments than my teacher taught me in an entire class period.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

thank you for the compliment, glad to help (blush)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!