Pulling out of a dive, a 51.0kg pilot on an airplane guides into a vertical circle with a radius of 4.91 m. At the bottom of the dive, the speed of the airplane is 129m/s. What is the apparent weight of the pilot at that point?
You're going to need to calculate the centripetal acceleration, using this formula: \[a_c=\frac{v^2}{r}\]So try that, and we can work from there.
Ac = (129m/s)^2 / 4.91m = 3389.205 or 3.39 x 10^3?
That's right. Now try drawing a free-body diagram of what's happening to the diver at the bottom of the circle of motion. There should be two forces acting upon him.
|dw:1352514275144:dw| Im not really sure how to draw this one because the way its worded, I have no clue whos going where and etc...
Well, the diver is at the BOTTOM of the circle, right? And which direction is a centripetal acceleration always in?
inwards
But I wasnt sure if I shouldve drawn that along the radius on the bottom?
Alright, so there are two forces acting upon the diver. One upward (centripetal acceleration) and one downward (gravitational acceleration). The free-body diagram will look like this:|dw:1352514696931:dw|
Ok I sort of get it.... still unsure how to do the entire problem though...
Well, the sum of the accelerations is the net acceleration. So: \[\sum a = a_c-a_g=3.39 \times 10^3 \frac{m}{s^2}-9.81 \frac{m}{s^2}=+3.38 \times 10^3 \frac{m}{s^2}\]This means that the net acceleration is upwards by that amount, and this can be converted to an apparent weight (although the apparent weight will be negative!)
Also, take note that that is a HUGE acceleration, but it makes sense. Trying to fly in a circle of radius of <5 meters at a tangential speed of 129 m/s is absolutely insane. In a real situation, the pilot would certainly die.
Well I tried finding the weight of the pilot and it said I ws incorrect.
I get\[-1.72 \times 10^5 N\]
Thats the answer I put in and it said I was incorrect.
Are you positive that the question is copied correctly. Because this comes out around to a really, really unreasonable 345 g-force.
491 for radius... sorry :S
I had a scribble in between the 4 and 9 and read it as 4.91
That makes a lot more sense :P. Just redo the calculations in the way they've already been done, and you should be good to go.
It ended up marking me wrong for the question, oh well. thanks anyways!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!