linear differential equation question: y"'-6y"+12y' -8y = 0
i need to find the general equation
find the roots of its associated quartic equation
y"'-6y"+12y' -8y or is that a triple? which would correspond to a cubic
r^3 -6r^2+12r -8 = 0 or ... may tryout a power solution since i think those are pretty awesome :)
its r^3-^r2+12r-8 = 0 is correct but what do i do from here?
determine the values of r that produce zeros for the function. after quadritic forms things can get complicated
we are in luck tho, this is really a perfect cube
r = 2,2,2 with a repetition of roots, the solutions i believe are modified with an extra x
so using quadratic formula we can find it?
to make the solutions linearly independant, we modify each :\[y=c_1e^{2x}+c_2~xe^{2x}+c_3~x^2e^{2x}\]
no, qubics cant be found by using the quadratic formula
or cubics even lol
r^3 -6r^2+12r -8 = 0 if it has rational roots, which would be nice, the rational roots thrm says that they must be in the form of the factors of the last term divided by factors of the first term since the first term is a 1; that leaves us with potential roots of: 1,2,4,8
to see if one of these options works out, synthetic division is a nice thing to know r^3 -6r^2+12r -8 0 2 -8 8 ---------------- 2 ) 1 -4 4 0 ; since we have a remainder of zero, 2 is a root and the equation reduces to a quadratic r^2 -4r + 4 = 0 ; which is a perfect square to begin with of the form (r-2)^2 so as it turns out, the whole thing was a perfect cube of the form: (r-2)^3 whose roots are r=2
so bascially since it is not factorable we try using the synthetic division to try out? and get the final general solution?
basically, yes :) which why an arsenal of algebraic techniques is useful to have at your disposal. For the most part, Its not the calculus that gets you in these things - its working thru the accursed algebra of it all ;)
oh geez but they are many options how do i know which one to choose =(
its not really about choosing one, it about choosing many of them and whittling them down to the one the actually works. Dont be afraid if your first attempt steers down the wrong way; you can always turn around and try another method
okAY THANK you so much~
can you name few that are mostly used when finding this kind of question i know that quadratic formula is one of them but not really sure about the rest
sum and difference of squares and cubes; perfect squares and cubes can be helpful as well as this one demonstrates
if you cardanos method for cubics ... which hardly anyone ive seen actually does since its a pain
okay thank you i will try few more and ask again thanks =)
okay i get it but how did we get for the answer (cl+clx+c3x^2)e^2x??
we require 3 linearly independant solutions since this is a third level derivative. The problem is we only obtain a single root for the e^part. to rectify this issue we adjust each solution by a factor of x to keep it linearly independant from one another
i see so x is more like trying to balance everything out in order to make it linearly independent?
yes. if we just say that the 3 solutions are c e^2x that only accounts for a "single" family set. the adjustment by a factor of x ensures us that the basic structure still works but that we cant create a similar solution from the 3 that we need
theres prolly a more stringent reason as to why, but i dont recall that details of it :)
i see wow thanks but how do i know exactly when to apply x? do i just apply x on each questions ?
if you see that you can only create one family set for a solution; and you require more; then you adjust the others with an additional product of x each time
\[y=c_1e^{2x}\]is one family of solution that satisfies this setup; but since its a third derivative setup, its has 3 linearly independant solutions to be found
\[y=c_1e^{2x}; y=c_2~xe^{2x}; y=c_3~x^2e^{2x}\]
http://college.cengage.com/mathematics/larson/calculus_early/3e/shared/chapter15/clc7eap1503.pdf that seems to be an easy read that should better explain it
no i perfectly understood what you said THANK you so much for helping me understand =)
youre welcome :) and good luck
one last question i did the same similar question but then i got r = \[\pm1\] would the answer be \[y = c1e^1x + c2e^-1x + c3xe^1x + c4x^2e^-1x \]
its the same thing i did above the orginal equation is y"'-y"-3y'+2y = 0
since e^x and e^-x are different functions, they they are already linearly independant; they stand apart from each other and can be rightfully called separate function in their own right; so as long as you only need 2 family solutions and not any more, then there would be no need to produce any extra adjustments
\[y=c_1e^x+c_2e^{-x}\]
oh i see thank you so much after reading through the link you provided it really cleared everything out now do you know stuff about undetermined coefficients?
the method of undetermined coeffs i believe deals with finding general and specific solutions to nonhomogenous diffyQs; there is the long hand version (works it all out by hand) and the short hand version (Wronskian). You determine the homogenous solutions and use those to define functions that are then worked out to find solutions to the nonhomogenous stuff
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!