Why do "Odd integrands" = 0? I'm trying to derive the formula for the volume of a torus. I'm using this explanation: http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20101104151437AAcr752 and at one point the equation is equal to 4π [∫(z = -r to r) z√(r² - z²) dz + ∫(z = -r to r) R√(r² - z²) dz] apparently the integral z√(r² - z²) dz is equal to zero "since the first integrand is odd on [-r, r]". I don't know what this means. Can anyone please explain? Thanks a lot!!
consider \[\int\limits_{-1}^{1}x dx=(x ^{2}/2)_{-1}^{1}=0\]
another way to make it zero ,x is an odd function as if f(x)=x f(-x)=-f(x)=-x=-f(x) so,f(x) is x is an odd function so,the integrand is zero
fine ???
ahh thanks so much! i think i understand so far...
how come the second integrand is not equal to zero though, even though it's practically the same thing but with a different constant?
which is the second integrand
see if the function between limits -r to r is odd ,,,,,,then only the answer is zero
odd function.....i guess you know
hmm..
i'm confused..but thank you for the help
confused at which step
it is because of the definition of the integral. the area u define either through Riemman's or Darboux's is "algebraic", i.e. it has a sign
hmm, well I appreciate it guys
not sure exactly where im lost. seems like i need to brush up on some concepts. Don't see why the sign makes it = 0
|dw:1352970537042:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!