Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 11 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Using vectors and dot product show the diagonals of a parallelogram have equal lengths if and only if it’s a rectangle. The proof is given on P.2 of: http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/mathematics/18-02sc-multivariable-calculus-fall-2010/part-a-vectors-determinants-and-planes/session-3-uses-of-the-dot-product-lengths-and-angles/MIT18_02SC_we_5_comb.pdf However, there are 2 parts in the proof, which I don't quite understand: 1) Why is BC+CD=BC-AB? 2) Why is |AC|^2=|BD|^2. i.e. why is |AB|^2+2AB*BC+|BC|^2=|BC|^-2BC*AB+|AB|^2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1353129370414:dw| these are vectors. BC - AB = BC + BA if it is a rectangle, BA = CD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

BC+CD=BC-AB? @irkiz

OpenStudy (anonymous):

*do you mean BC+CD=BC-AB?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh wait I'm beginning to see what you're saying

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-BA = BA

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, got you

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you mean -AB=BA? or -BA=AB is valid too?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

*-BA=BA i mean

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-BA is not equal to BA this is vectors. - means opposite direction means different vectors

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes, understood. so only -BA=AB and -AB=BA

OpenStudy (anonymous):

-BA = AB but -BA not= BA however |-BA| = |BA| yup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

understood

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the second part is a bit hard to explain on a computer. give me a moment to try to figure out how to explain

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think I understand how the second part follows from the first. It's just geometry and vectors again right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yup

OpenStudy (anonymous):

same principle as in first part?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the only thing im still a bit confused about is the 4AB*BC=0 in the end

OpenStudy (anonymous):

is it just |AC|^2-|BD|^2 multiplied out?

OpenStudy (sirm3d):

the problem consists of two parts: (i) the parallelogram is a rectangle IF AC = BD; and (ii) AC = BD if the parallelogram is a rectangle (i) assuming AC = BD we prove that the angles are right angles (the dot product equals zero)

OpenStudy (sirm3d):

AC.AC = AB.AB + 2 AB.BC + BC.BC BD.BD = BC.BC - 2 AB.BC + AB.AB because segment AC = segment BD it follows that AC.AC = BD.BD therefore AB.AB + 2 AB.BC + BC.BC = BC.BC - 2 AB.BC + AB.AB cancelling equal terms 2 AB.BC = -2 AB.BC or, after transposing the term on the RHS 4 AB.BC = 0 therefore AB.BC =0 AB is perpendicular to BC hence the parallelogram is a rectangle

OpenStudy (sirm3d):

@nexis i hope i made that part clear to you.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

@sirm3d thinking through your explanation right now

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes that was absolute sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

makes*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thank you :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

for the long and involved explanation. Just starting out with multi-variable, still need to get used to thinking in vectors

OpenStudy (sirm3d):

(ii) part two of the proof: the reverse solution begins with AB.BC = 0 (the angle formed is a right angle) and ends in AC.AC = BD.BD (the diagonals are congruent)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yes, thank you :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!