In the radio broadcast of the Hindenburg disaster, the journalist continues with his report even though he is audibly shaken and even near tears. Why did he continue to broadcast? It was the only way he could send word for help to get out of the building. The reporter wasn't sure the disaster hadn't actually been staged. American law required him to document the disaster for posterity. He wanted to provide the details of the disaster to the audience.
@Spectrum
The first one makes no sense at all. Hindenburg was a blimp that caught on fire. The second one doesnt either..if its a reporter there....and people are dying while this reporter is nearly in tears....they would be sure it wasn't. American law i don't think requirs disasters to be continued to be reported.. so the only one left is the last one. not sure though
okay.. i need help still :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!