Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 15 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Evaluate.....

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[\int\limits_{5}^{0} 2x \sqrt{x+4} dx\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

use substitution

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Having a little trouble with the 2x term marnie? :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

u=x+4 du=dx x=u-4 =2(u-4)(u) du?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You don't want any multiplication between variables!!

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\huge =2(u-4)(\sqrt u)du\]I think you missed one small detail marnie :O

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yes i missed that....ok im honestly lost from here.....if i can't have multiplication between variables what do i do?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Well now your multiplication isn't so bad, since the squareroot doesn't have a bunch of funky junk inside of it. Rewrite the sqrt(u) using fractional exponents, then simply expand out the brackets! :)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok: \[\int\limits_{0}^{5}u ^{3/2}-4u ^{1/2)}\]

zepdrix (zepdrix):

\[\large 2\int\limits (u-4)\sqrt u du \quad = \quad 2\int\limits (u-4)u^{1/2} du\] \[\large =2\int\limits u^{1+1/2}-4u^{1/2} du \quad \rightarrow \quad 2\int\limits u^{3/2}-4u^{1/2}du\] Yes looks good ^^ I'm not sure where your 2 went though heh

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yes ok.... 2 * (2/3u^3/2-8/3u^3/2) =-4u^3/2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

=-4(x+4)^3/2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Oh no.....i think that's wrong......i forgot about my 0 and 5. ahh confusing

zepdrix (zepdrix):

On your second term, it doesn't look like you increased the power by 1. should be u^5/2 i believe. So they won't combine nicely.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh yes ur right

OpenStudy (anonymous):

=4/5u^5/2 - 16u^3/2 then what do i do? Do i enter my 0 and 5?

zepdrix (zepdrix):

The second term has a coefficient of 16/3, the way you had it before :) Recall that the limits of integration were for our X variable!! x=0 and x=5 are our limits of integration. We have 2 options from here, We can either rewrite our solution in terms of x, undoing the U substition we made earlier, and then we can plug in the 0 and 5. OR We can find new limits of integration by looking at our substitution, and plugging in the 0 and 5. They both will take about the same amount of work, so which ever way you prefer.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

ok phew! That makes sense. Thank u!

zepdrix (zepdrix):

Yay team \:D/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

too bad i can't bring you to my exam hahah

zepdrix (zepdrix):

lol XD

OpenStudy (anonymous):

actually I have a question....I have the answer to this question, but it's different and i noticed this other person changed the 0 and 5, to a 9 and 4. Why would they do that?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!