show working to solve for x: x/m+n=x/n+m and get x=-mn
\[{x \over m}+n={x \over n}+m\]Is this the problem
yes
\[{x \over m}+n={x \over n}+m\]\[{x \over m}-{x \over n}=m-n\]\[{xn \over mn}-{xm \over mn}=m-n\]\[{xn-xm \over mn}=m-n\]\[{x(n-m) \over mn}=m-n\]\[x={(m-n)mn \over (n-m)}\]Getting close :)
so far im with you...
\[x={(m-n)mn \over (n-m)}\]\[-1(x)=-1({(m-n)mn \over (n-m)})\]\[-x={(n-m)mn \over (n-m)}\]\[-x=mn\]\[x=-mn\]
any questions?
if i was given the question, how would i know to continue like that?
if i wasn't given the answer
So basically what was my mind set? Ok..
I knew I eventually needed x by itself. So my first thing I wanted to do was get the x's on the same side of the equation
I moved the constants to the other side as well
In order to subtract those fractions and bring the x's together I needed a common denominator
if u were told just to solve for x, without knowing its going to be -mn, would you have still gotten -mn?
Honestly I probably would have left it at the end of my first post
ok, thanks. i really appreciate your time.
I wonder if \[\frac{ m-n }{ n-m }=-1\]for all cases. If you knew that then I guess you can arrive at that final answer
right!
Also you could realize that if you multiplied it by -1 you could cancel it out. the denominator. I don't really know why you would continue on without knowing these other things.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!