Find (f^-1)'(a) of: 2x^3+3x^2+7x+4
Can you do the derivative of f(x) or do the inverse first and figure the Derivative?
\[f'(x) = 6x ^{2}+6x+7\]
Would it be easier ("nicer") to do the inverse of the f'(x) or just the inverse of f(x)? I think it will be ugly either way?
Hmm I actually haven't seen this type of problem before :D lol Lemme think about it a few minutes... My initial guess is that we probably have to take the inverse first, get it back in terms of x (somehow..) THEN differentiate.
Ok, I will keep trying it also. I have done just that: \[y=2x ^{3}+3x ^{2}+7x+4\] \[x=2y ^{3}+3y ^{2}+7y+4\] Then solve. That is what i have been doing.
Also tried the same above but with the derivative.
My chapter is eventually working into Exponential,Logarithmic, and Inverse Trig Functions.
\[x=2y ^{3}+3y ^{2}+7y+4\] \[x-4 = y(2y ^{2}+3y+7)\] \[x-4=y(2y+1)(y+3)\]
?
\[\large \left[f^{-1}\right]'(a)=\frac{1}{f'(f^{-1}(a))}\]I keep coming across this equation.. still trying to make sense of it though :D heh
DOH SORRY, totally forgot. a=4
Oh hmm maybe we can do something with that :)
Which you still need to find the inverse though ... right?
seems like it XD lol that seems to be the tricky part, hmmm
Of course it will be tricky :-) Calculus = 1% Calc and 99% Algebra. But that 1% Calculus make the Algebra "tricky".
Is it "legal" to do the following? \[x=2y ^{3}+3y ^{2}+7y+4\] \[x ^{1/3}=2(\sqrt[3]{3y ^{2}+7y+4}\]
Where did the y^3 go? You were attempting to take the cube root of that separately from the rest of the thing? Mmm yah that doesn't quite work the way you want it to :C
figured :-)
How about what I did up above, would that get us anywhere?
Maybe yes, let's think about this a second...\[\large x=2y^3+3y^2+7y+4\]Here is the inverse function of f, written in terms of Y. If we were ABLE to write it in terms of x, we would be plugging in a=4 for the X value right? Let's try plugging in 4 for the X value right now, maybe that will get us somewhere.\[\large 4=2y^3+3y^2+7y+4 \qquad \rightarrow \qquad 0=2y^3+3y^2+7y\]
hmmmmmm \[f ^{-1}(y) = x <---> f(x)=y\] Could we put a into f(x) and that would give us y?
Hmm that's an interesting idea :o
\[f(4)=208\] \[f ^{-1}(208)=4\] \[(f ^{-1})'(a)=\frac{ 1 }{ f'(f ^{-1}(4)) }\] \[(f ^{-1})'(a) = \frac{ 1 }{ f'(208) }\] \[(f ^{-1})'(a)=\frac{ 1 }{ 260839 }\] But .... Not even close t the answer in the back.
What's the back say? :o
Heh \[\frac{ 1 }{ 7 }\]
Close in some aspect :-)
lol :3
I typed this into Wolfram: inverse of 2x^3+3x^2+7x+4 And got this:
I hope that this is not what I need to do. That is ....... not pretty.
No I'm sure it's not what you need to do. There is clearly some little trick that we're just not seeing. :\
And everyone who pops on to take a look runs screaming.
@Zarkon is a pretty smart dude :d Maybe he'll take a look at it if he has time. :D I might have to give up on this one :C grr
That's ok. I appreciate all the help. I may try to send a message and see what happens. Thank you.
Well I did the little @ symbol thing. That is the best way to try and get someones attention. :D It's like paging someone. It lets them know that you called, and they can click on the page to come directly to your thread. So it's a handy little tool to use :D
Didn't know that. Thanks for the little nugget of info.
Hello
@jim_thompson5910 Help?
@helder_edwin Help? Inverse Derivatives
Hello
Thank you for coming and taking a look.
a = 4 correct?
Correct.
when you plug in x = 0, you get f(x) = 4 so f^-1(4) = 0, agreed?
agreed .....
so... [ f^-1]' (a) = 1/[ f' ( f^-1(a) ) ] [ f^-1]' (4) = 1/[ f' ( f^-1(4) ) ] [ f^-1]' (4) = 1/[ f' ( 0 ) ] [ f^-1]' (4) = 1/7
so that would make: \[\frac{ 1 }{ f'(0) }\]
f(x) = 2x^3+3x^2+7x+4 f ' (x) = 6x^2+6x+7 f ' (0) = 6(0)^2+6(0)+7 f ' (0) = 7
yes
yes. So completly wrong plugging 4 in and solving the equation.
what do you mean?
Posted this earlier: hmmmmmm f−1(y)=x<−−−>f(x)=y Could we put a into f(x) and that would give us y?
it's the other way around, you plug in y = a and solve for x
to find f^-1(a)
So I did f(x) = 2(4)^3+3(4)^2+7(4)+4 When I should of done: 4=.............
if you plugged in x = 4 into f(x), you'd get 208, but that's way off of what we want
yeah exactly
luckily 4 is the y-intercept, so it's kinda easy to solve for (if you know what to look for)
ohhh man way to easy, thank you form coming to help.
yw
Thank you for coming to take a look. Made it way to complecated.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!