Can someone please check this? Line segment BD is congruent to line segment CD. I think that the reason for this is the Partition Postulate. Am I correct?
is there more to this question?
Yes, just a moment.
|dw:1355263286875:dw|
Given: Line segment AB is congruent to line segment AC, angle BAD is congruent to CAD Prove: line segment AD bisects line segment BC
Statements: 1. line segment AB is congruent to line segment AC 2. angle BAD is congruent to angle CAD 3. line segment AD is congruent to line segment AD 4. Triangle BAD is congruent to triangle CAD 5. line segment BD is congruent to line segment CD 6. Line segment AD bisects line segment BC Reasons: 1. Given 2. Given 3. Reflexive Property 4. ??? 5. ??? 6. Definition of Segment Bisector
That's everything.
They want the reason for statement 4: 4 . Triangles are congruent. What ways do you know to show 2 triangles are congruent? now look at statements 1,2,3 what do they say?
1. line segment AB is congruent to line segment AC 2. angle BAD is congruent to angle CAD 3. line segment AD is congruent to line segment AD
"What ways do you know to show 2 triangles are congruent?" By using tick marks or the half circle symbol.
line segment (also known as) a SIDE of the triangle
See http://www.regentsprep.org/Regents/math/geometry/GPB/theorems.htm You prove triangles are congruent by (1) SSS (2) SAS (3) ASA (4) AAS
The first 3 statements are helpful to using one of those 4. Which one?
I'd say the second one perhaps.
there is no perhaps 1. line segment AB is congruent to line segment AC <--- means SIDE = SIDE 2. angle BAD is congruent to angle CAD <--- means ANGLE = ANGLE 3. line segment AD is congruent to line segment AD <--- means SIDE = SIDE
I understand.
once you show SAS in that order, you have proven the triangles are congruent. Reason 4: SAS
I understand what you mean. Am I correct for the fifth reason?
The whole reason you prove the triangles are congruent is so you can claim some part of them are congruent, in this case their "bottom" leg
If you know 2 triangles are congruent then you know the "parts" that correspond are congruent. what is the "short-hand" way of saying this?
the CPCTC Theorem
that is the reason for 5
Okay, thanks for your help Phi!
The partition postulate is used to say that the sum of 2 angles (for example) add up to a bigger angle. See the link for the exact wording.
Oh okay, I understand.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!