Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 12 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

lim (2x - 5) = 3 x->4 Prove this statement using the e, delta definition of a limit and illustrate with a diagram.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

a diagram?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Thats just the problem, I think I can probably get the diagram honestly.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

draw a line, put the coordinate \((4,3)\) on the line and a little interval round it

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1355412295128:dw|

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay. That part makes sense.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you need to find the \(\delta\) that works for any \(\epsilon\) so as usual you work backwards start with the definition of the limit \[\lim_{x\to 4}2x+5=3\] means: given \(\epsilon>0\) there is a \(\delta\) such that if \(|x-4|<\delta\) you have \(|2x-5-3|<\epsilon\) and now it is algebra

OpenStudy (anonymous):

typo there of course i meant \[\lim_{x\to 4}2x-5=3\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the algebra is not bad in this case it is the idea of working backwards that is usually confusing

OpenStudy (anonymous):

You nailed my problem. Exact definition of limits is killing me/

OpenStudy (anonymous):

you want \[|2x-5-3|<\epsilon\] so we force it to work \[|2x-5-3|=|2x-8|=|2(x-4)|=2|x-4|\] is a start

OpenStudy (anonymous):

now you want to make sure that \[2|x-4|<\epsilon\] but you control the size of \(|x-4|\) so at this point you can say "pick \(\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{2}\)" that way we know if \[|x-4|<\frac{\epsilon}{2}\] we are assured that \[2|x-4|<\epsilon\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

then you run the algebra backwards, since each step is reversible, and you have your "proof" in real life of course once you get the the step i wrote above you are done, but the proof is running the steps in reverse

OpenStudy (zarkon):

I would just add... in the definition we need \[0<|x-4|<\delta\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not coincidentally if you have a line with slope \(m\) you can pick \(\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{m}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

what @Zarkon said he always keeps me honest

OpenStudy (anonymous):

So the answer to exact definitions are generally rather abstract?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if you mean by abstract you have to use a general \(\epsilon\) rather than a number, like say \(0.01\) then yes your job is to find the \(\delta\) that works for every \(\epsilon\) which in plain english means \(\delta\) is a function of \(\epsilon\) in this example you can use \(\delta=\frac{\epsilon}{2}\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay. That makes sense for the most part. Thanks!

OpenStudy (anonymous):

practice will make it make more sense write the definition down in the general case then write what it means in your specific case then figure out what \(\delta\) you need from algebra at the beginning it should be obvious, as in the algebra i wrote above gets harder later

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!