Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 14 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

Write the contrapositive of the conditional statement below. “ n is a prime number implies that n=2 or n is an odd number.” Your answer must contain a conjunction in its premise.

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

So in general, the contrapositive of the statement (\(\,p\implies q\)) is \((\neg \,q\implies \neg \,p\)). In this case, both your p and q are other sentences. Can you tell me what the "p" is in your conditional statement?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n is a prime number

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Right. And the "q"?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n is an odd number

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Almost. The "q" in your statement is "n=2 or n is an odd number." Notice that there's an "or" in this statement, so even this can be broken down into something like "q OR r," where q is "n=2", and r is "n is an odd number."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i

OpenStudy (anonymous):

SEE

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

So the statement "n is a prime number implies that n=2 or n is an odd number" can be rewritten as \[p\implies (q \vee r)\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

if n is not a odd number then n is not a prime number or n = 2

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

You're very close, and certainly have the right idea. The contrapositive of \(p\implies (q\vee r)\) is \(\neg(q\vee r)\implies \neg p\). Can you tell me what \(\neg(q\vee r)\) can be rewritten as?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not sure

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

This is a thing called "De Morgan's Law." It says that \[\neg(q\vee r) \Longleftrightarrow (\neg \,q) \wedge(\neg\,r) \]Can you translate this back into our statements?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

im confused

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

So if q is "n=2," what is ~q?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

not =2

OpenStudy (anonymous):

|dw:1355893931180:dw|

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Right. And if r is "n is an odd number," what is ~r?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

n is not an odd number

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Bingo. So if we then combine those two statements, ~q AND ~r can be written as "n is not 2, and n is not an odd number." Make sense?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

Great. Then the contrapositive of your original statement should be "If n is not 2, and n is not an odd number, then n is not prime."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

that the answer it was that simple?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

That was it. Did it all make sense?

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

You almost had it the first time, you just got a little mixed up with the second half of the statement.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes but what does it mean by Your answer must contain a conjunction in its premise.

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

That just means that it has to have "and" somewhere in the statement. So the way it's written, it's fine. If we had written it as "If n is an even integer greater than two, then n is not prime" instead, which says the same thing, it would not be the correct solution because it does not contain "and."

OpenStudy (anonymous):

oh i see thanks so much!!

OpenStudy (kinggeorge):

You're welcome.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!