Ask your own question, for FREE!
Biology 5 Online
OpenStudy (anonymous):

These are weird questions to me.. help.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Recently James noticed a strange smell coming from the water and noticed a large number of dead fish at the surface. He thought that a change in the environment was causing the fish to die. James asked the coast guard about the brownish red color of the water and discovered it was algae. James wondered if the alga was killing the fish. To test his idea, he collected water from the ocean area that was brownish red in color with high levels of algae, then went further north of his area and located water that did not appear to have the same algae. He also caught 12 small fish that appeared healthy from the northern area. James obtained three 30 gallon tanks and set each tank up properly. Tank 1: James placed 30 gallons of the water with no algae, Tank 2: He put 15 gallons of water with no algae and 15 gallons of water with algae Tank 3: He put 30 gallons of water with algae. He placed 4 fish in each tank. After making careful notes every 3 hours, his results showed that after 72 hours, all fish in Tank 2 and Tank 3 were dead. No fish in tank 1 showed any signs of sickness. If we wanted to know for sure that the algae was causing the fish deaths, what would need to be done with James' experiment? A: nothing B: continue observing the area C: redo the experiment using the same variables D: do a totally different lab experiment I'm thinking either do nothing or conduct a totally different lab experiment. He kind of already proved that it was the algae though, right?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

he proved it was in the water containing the algae. It have been something else. One idea could be to isolate the algae, culture it and expose the fishes to it (or the water in which it was grown).

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I think that the experiment proves it was the algae or something that was coincident with the algae in the affected areas. If the water that killed the fish could be filtered to remove the algae and the fish were ok after the same amount of time as in the initial experiment then you could say it was the algae. But it's a tough question right enough. I'm intrigued to see if anyone agrees with me. Best wishes

OpenStudy (anonymous):

I almost agree... but the problem if you only filter the water and the fish get killed it could still be the algae (e.g. if the algae produces a toxin externally)...

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Which is the independent variable in this experiment?nt?

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!