Please compute f(5), when f(2x+6)=3+x. Do I plug 5 into the 2x+6, or the 3+x first? Thanks!
Is the x in 3+x meant to be different?
The question says that y=f(x) is defined for all real numbers
Yes but if you plug 5 into that equation, f(x) does not equal 3 + x
yeah, I was thinking of setting 2x+6 equal to 5, so then x = -1/2, and then plugging that into 3+x
No, put 5 as x into the equation 2x+6, creating 16.
or should i plug 2x+6 into 3+x and get 9+2x?
Then put 16=x+3 and take 3 from both sides
ok, so then I add 16 +3 to get the answer of 19?
o, nevermind, so its 13
That's what I'd assume, although I'm not sure as I don't know why the x's would be different
yeah idk either. but dont you think the answer would be 19? cause it's f(16)=3+x
it's not 16=3+x
You should go with what you thought originally, that seems right. After re reading it, put 2x+6=5
hmm, ok, thanks
A decent way of doing so is to first solve \(2x + 6 = 5\) which comes out to be \(-\dfrac{1}{2}\) followed by plugging \(-\dfrac{1}{2}\) in. You will get \(3 + \left(-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\)
ok, thank you!! That's how I decided to do it too
Geez, there's another way out too: The tricky one!
Notice how \(f(2x + 6) = x + 3 = \dfrac{1}{2}\left(2x + 6\right)\). One may conclude that \(f(x) = 0.5x\) and thus \(f(5) =\cdots\)
oh! That's smart. Thanks a bunch!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!