[ORGANIC CHEMISTRY] How would you guys name two cycloheptane placed as borromean rings.
See attachment to see what I mean
I would use bicyclo nomenclature.
yea but that does not explain the fact that the 2 rings ain't linked with covalent bonds... they are not link at all... just traped.
But it doesn't look like they're attached in the picture. It looks like simply two cycloheptanes.
I trid to draw it so good i could :P
Well, in a solution, you have to remember that molecules are free floating. They are not in a solid state and are able to move about freely and crash into one another which might explain why they are in that manner.
and the molecule do exsist.... acording to my prof
I'm sure that the molecule does exist. I'm not saying it doesn't, but my argument would be that, assuming they are in liquid state, they are able to crash into one another, causing bonds to be broken and new bonds to form within itself.
in a bottle of water, molecules are free floating, able to crash and break bonds and create new ones with other molecules is what I'm trying to explain.
if no bond exists then they cannot be put in one nomenclature per se. but you can always make up a name just to sound cool
So this molecule is from now on named.... molecule-WithOut-Name-1 or just WON1
There most be some way to name it...
you can use the prefix pseudo
Hmm think the gold book by IUPAC could have info?
maybe...
they cannot be interlocked permanently
abbot check my chem question
Okie dokie :)
where is your chem Q? Lol
I have to log-in to my school database to be able to read the contents of that
same here, but atleast i found something that can give a hint.
But think it could be named cycloheptane[2]catenane
it should work
but if they do not function as a whole, it doesn't matter
does that occur naturally?
Engineered I would say,
or perhaps 1 in a 10^10
2,6-diformylpyridine
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!