Trying to formalize my answer to http://i.imgur.com/Or6h9.jpg
File not found
So \( M = 10^{61}\cdot2k + 10^{60}\cdot 2k +\cdots+10^{0}\cdot 2k\) and \(N = 10^{60}\cdot k + 10^{59}\cdots 10^0\cdot k\) where \(k=3\).
this is easy...... wherever you see 9, just ignore it, like 94-->sum=4 637--->6+3=9---->sum = 7 here, sum of digits for N will be 0, so sum of digits for N*M =0
So how would I get the digit sum? I got \(558\) because I noticed that the digit sum is always \(9\times [\text{number of 6's}]\) for all \(\underbrace{666\cdots666}_{n \text{ number of 6's}} \times \underbrace{333\cdots333}_{n-1 \text{ number of 3's}}\)
0 or 9, both are equivalent.
It's actually \(558\) @hartnn
9 can be ignored.....thats the catch.
digit sum is always single digit.
2219778 = 36 ^Like this
Yes. ^
oh, sorry, there are 61 3's , so we ignore 60 3's as their sum is 0 and what remains is one 3 so, sum of digits og N =3
36 is still 3+6=9
No, we just need 36 :)
hmm... then use some different method...
But we need the digit sum of \(M\times N\)...
My method was a little brute-forcey. I need a formal method =/
sum of digits follow distributive property
@ParthKohli Mine is even worse.. Digit sum of MxN= 2(n-2)+7(n-2)+1+9+8 :|
How did you get that? ._.
lol
By observation :|
3x66 = 198 33x666=21978 333x6666=2219778 3333x66666=222197778 Sigh... Too bad :(
But that's not the digit sum :p the digit sum would be number of 6's times 9.\[198\mapsto 18 \ \ \rm and \ \ 9 \times \underbrace{2}_{number ~of~6's} =18\]Try this for others
Hmm... I meant to say from the above results, I got this: digit sum of MxN = 2(n-2) + 7(n-2) +1+9+8, n= no. of 6 I know it's not good.
Oh yes :D you're completely right!
But I wanna formalize the answer =(
@satellite73 Would you mind giving a hand here?
Yo @satellite73
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!