Question

In 1917, the pacifist and socialist Norman Thomas described conscientious objectors in this way: "He may believe in dying for one's country, or for ideals; but not in killing for them."
How does this quotation help explain the role that many conscientious objectors played overseas during the war?
-They supported their country and wanted to help in a non-combat role.
-They were dissenters and worked behind the scenes to secretly help the enemy.
-They were dissenters and worked to convince American soldiers to leave the army.
-They were supporters but wanted to convert American soldiers.

Answer 1

The latter three statements don't describe conscientious objectors at all, but mere traitors. Only the first statement describes conscientious objects. Unfortunately, it only describes some of them. Some COs objected to compulsory service of the state in any kind, so they would not have been willing to serve in *any* role assigned to them by the government. Others were willing to serve, but not in any role that would assist a war, offensive or defensive. So these were willing to, say, work on a farm, but would not work in a war industry or serve as a noncombatant (medic, messenger) in the army. Only some of the COs fit the final category, which is men who were willing to be conscripted, willing to serve in the army and help with the war effort -- but would not fire a gun or attempt to kill someone else.

By the way, to be a "socialist" and a "pacifist" in 1917 is impossible. Socialism was only imposed on nations by armed force in those days, and at considerable cost in bloodshed. Socialism killed far more people in the mid-20th century than either of the World Wars.

Answer 2

It's kind of like describing yourself as a strong supporter of law enforcement and a Mafia boss.

Answer 3

ohh ok(: thank you very much!