Find the depth at which the G-field of a star is 25% with a density given by p(x), given radius is 4000km and mass at the surface is 3000kg.
@UnkleRhaukus
p=m/v now i know that the change in density is going to be due to the change i mass and volume
so would it be \[dp=\frac{dm}{dv}\]
my teacher had his second equation in a similar problem as \[pdv=dm\] which i can only get if i let \[p*dv=\frac{dm}{dv}*dv\]
p is a linear function also
|dw:1358678795614:dw|
What subject is this?
it's calculus-based physics
the only unrelevant equation that makes it physics is \[g=\frac{Gm}{r^2}\] where G is the gravitational constant \[6.67*10^{-11}\] m is the mass below and r is the radius to the center
so since we're given a radius and a mass you can find out what the Gfield is at the surface and solve for what 25% of it is. However to find the unknowns depth and mass , we need calculus
calculus is needed due to the fact that the mass and volume are changing as you get farther into the core which changes the density
|dw:1358679271874:dw|
\[dp \neq \frac{ dm }{ dv }\]
\[p=\frac{dm}{dv}\]
\[dp = \frac{ vdm - mdv }{ v^2 }\]
correct so where does \[pdv=dm\] come from
by any chance, is the density function given? p(x)?
ehh i think it was something like (-.0000007+10^4)r
it is (-.000005r+10^4)
So p(x) is (-.000005r+10^4)?
pdv = dm is wrong
p(x) given?
p=-.0000004r+10^4
i need somehow to relate the change of mass nad volume to the change in radius
or change in density
|dw:1358680137198:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!