Partial Fractions
Find the exact values of A, B, C, and D in the following (see attachment). I forgot how to derive these values. Can someone help?
you would multiply both sides by the \[z ^{4}-1\] then distribute the values. this is a long one to explain so i will go step by step with you if you need me to
okay, so if you multiplied z^4-1 on both sides, you would end up with: z = A / (z +1) * z^4 - 1 + B / (z-1) *z^4 -1 + (Cz + D) / (z^2 + 1) * z^4 -1 z^4 - 1 = (z - 1) (z+1)(z^2 +1), so you'd end up with: A(z-1)(z^2 +1) + B(z+1)(z^2-1) + (Cz + D)(z-1)(z+1) Correct?
Oh yeah, all of that equal to z
How would I proceed from here? (assuming im correct up until this point)
so you have z = A(z-1)(z^2 +1) + B(z+1)(z^2-1) + (Cz + D)(z-1)(z+1) then you distribute everything out- A(z-1)(z^2 +1) = (Az-a)(Z^2+1) = AZ^3+AZ+AZ^2-a and so on through the rest of the values
Nevermind c: looks like you're on the right track.
Az^3 + Az - Az^2 - A + Bz^3 -Bz + Bz^2 - B + (Cz + D)(z^2-1) = Az^3 + Az - Az^2 - A + Bz^3 -Bz + Bz^2 - B + Cz^3 - Cz + Dz^2 - D
Az^3 - Az^2 + Az - A + Bz^3 + Bz^2 - Bz - B + Cz^3 + Dz^2 - Cz - D = z
how am I doing
looks great! so the next step is to figure out what a, b, c, and d equal. the left equation could read 0z^3+0z^2+z+0. you would take all of the like powers of Z and set them equal to the corresponding coeffiecent on the left side. For power z^3, we have 0z^3 = Az^3 + Bz^3 +Cz^3. then, because all of the z^3 are common, we have 0= a + B + C. you would do the same thing for 0z^2,z, and 0. does that make sense? i can try to explain it better if i need to
you'd have 4 equations?
yes.
0z^3 = Az^3 + Bz^3 +Cz^3 0z^2 = -Az^2 +Bz^2 0z = Az - Bz - Cz 0 = -A - B
?
you are missing the D variable in those. the second one and the last one should have a D
and it should be Z= Az+Bz+Cz. the coefficient for that was 1, not zero.
0z^3 = Az^3 + Bz^3 +Cz^3 0z^2 = -Az^2 +Bz^2 + Dz^2 z = Az - Bz - Cz 0 = -A - B - D Im not seeing where the coefficient youre talking about is coming from
never mind about the coefficient. you got it right now. now you eliminate the z's from all the equations- effectively dividing each by the respective term, so you get 0 = A + B +C 0 = -A +B + D 1 = A - B - C 0 = -A - B - D which is a system of equations you can use to solve for each of the variables. the end result is substituting the value in for each variable in the original equation:
So can I use the elimination method to simplify the first two equations, then do it again with the bottom two, and then again with the result from those 2?
you could. or use matrices or any method for solving.
1 = A - B - C 0 = -A - B - D 1 = -2B - (C - D) 0 = A + B +C 0 = -A +B + D 0 = 2B + (C + D) 1 = -2B - (C - D) 0 = 2B + (C + D)
If I eliminate again, that doesn't look like it will come out right.
Wait
I'm trying to isolate 1 letter. I don't know if that's possible.
thats why i think in this case matrices would be best. im trying to find a resource to help explain.
I did this, Matrix A = 1 1 1 0 -1 1 1 0 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 0 rref(A) = 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
I don't know if that helps me though
\[\frac{z}{z^4-1}=-\frac{z}{2 \left(z^2+1\right)}+\frac{1}{4 (z-1)}+\frac{1}{4 (z+1)} \]
What, how do you even get those numbers?
ok. here's a link. its about halfway down the page- starts with 'consider to following example' https://www.boundless.com/algebra/50d49650e4b0965b097acfe2/50d49650e4b0965b097acfe9/50d49650e4b0965b097ad0a2/#.UQIj1yfC1qU
I did that morgan, but my calculator didnt give me any fractions like that guys post up there.
you shouldn't get fractions. you would get the values of A, B, C, and D. which you then plug into that. hold on im trying to write it out
If one had to solve this type of problem for a living, then one would buy a copy of the Mathematica program and enter the following and then press the Enter key on the numeric pad of a PC keyboard:\[\text{Apart}\left[\frac{z}{z^4-1}\right] \]
the B matrix would be 0 0 1 0 the a matrix would be 1 1 1 0 -1 1 0 1 1 -1 -1 0 -1 -1 0 -1
To model the equations 0 = A + B + c 0 = -A + B + D 1 = A - B - C 0 = -A - B - D wouldnt matrix a be 1 1 1 0 -1 1 1 0 1 -1 -1 1 -1 -1 -1 0
Or wait, would it be 5 x 5 to account for the fact you're missing C and D in some cases? in which case you put a 0 there.
4 x 5
it would be a 4x4. you place a 0 where a variable is missing
but what about the = 0, doesn't that part go on the last column of each row?
you also need to keep the order of the variables the same. we are doing two different types i think. are you doing row echelon?
the way i recall how to do it, you take the coefficients for the variables, set them up in a matrix A, the constant ( the =0 part) in another matrix B. multiply the inverse of A times B.
i apologize that this is so confusing and long.
http://mathbits.com/MathBits/TIsection/Precalculus/matrices.htm If you look at example 2 when they use reduced row echelon, the equals part is on the far right. That's what I'm going by at the moment.
I appreciate your patience! I really want to understand this.
in that case yes it would be a 4 by 5.
the thing i noticed you were missing was the placeholders. in your matrix you put up earlier
Okay, the resulting matrix from rref(A) is: 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 .5 .5 0 0 0 1 -1 -1 0 0 0 0 1 You're right, I was missing them, but I've corrected that and put the variables in same order when I constructed the 4 x 5 matrix that produced that answer I just got above.
well darn. haha.
ok. hold on
yeah this one is a doozy
I thought I was on to something when we were back here: A(z-1)(z^2 +1) + B(z+1)(z^2-1) + (Cz + D)(z-1)(z+1) = z If we let z equal something like 1, you still can't isolate A, B, C, or D. you end up with 0 = 1, which is weird
or if you let z = 2
you get 5A + 11B + 6C + 3D = 2
sorry, 9B
well it makes sense that z couldnt be 1, because then the original equation would be undefined. so it has to be a value greater than 1, between 1 and -1, or less than -1.
so maybe that's the problem. its not diffrentiable on all x. but i also dont understand why they would give such a problem if that was unsolvable, really. so. im not sure how we want to proceed. its possible there is an error somewhere in all of this that got perpetuated into the matrix- the matrix was close. i tried my matrix method and it came up with a error.
i guess the question becomes, do you understand now how to derive the values, though we can't exactly complete this problem?
Yes, I believe I have a much better understanding/approach to these types of problems.
Your patience is legendary :)
Thank you
thanks. and you're welcome!
ok.. im gonna go now. i wish you luck!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!