Need help with 11 through 18 help anyone http://www.ocs.cnyric.org/webpages/jmelfi/files/GE09S3P1.PDF
For number 14, you have a line AD which is parallel to BC, right, since it's a parallelogram?
yes I got that
The line AC is a transverse line to this set of parallel lines, so x and angle CAD, which measures 46 degrees, are congruent. Thus, x = 46 degrees.
Because x and angle CAD are alternate interior angles.
Then angle BCD measures 44 + 46 = 90 degrees, making it a right angle. This makes angle BAD a right angle as well. All quadrilaterals have interior angles that sum up to 360 degrees, and in parallelograms, opposite angles are congruent, so angle ABC is a right angle, as well as angle ADC. It's a rectangle.
because all its interior angles are right angles. We know nothing about the lengths of the sides or the angle made by its diagonals, so we cannot say it's a square.
Is it a rectangle then
Yes, and that's the best we can say about it.
okay so what would X be
X is alternate interior to the angle measuring 46 degrees, and therefore has the same measure.
oh ok so can we do number 11
Right... For number 11, you can get the value of x immediately. Ever heard of vertical angles?
yes isnt it V shape
What's the vertical angle to the angle measuring x-degrees?
Here's an example of a pair of vertical angles: |dw:1359433855891:dw|
So clearly, x and the angle measuring 85 degrees are vertical angles. Vertical angles are always congruent, so x = 85 degrees.
so the shape would be a square
then you would subtract 180- 85 then get 95 to be y
No. Remember that for something to be a square (or a rhombus, for that matter), the diagonals must be perpendicular. Are they?
no
would it be a parallelogram
No. Let's take a piece of that square, shall we? |dw:1359434202358:dw|
so it is a square
|dw:1359434270176:dw| THIS is the angle that measures 95 degrees.
They are ALL parallelograms.
Again, for it to be a square, the diagonals MUST be perpendicular, and they're not, as you said.
oh so I was right it is 95
That angle is 95, but that is not y. In particular, since this is an isosceles triangle, then that other angle is also congruent to y |dw:1359434500655:dw|
So, knowing that all triangles have interior angles summing up to 180, you get 95 + y + y = 180 2y = 85 y = 42.5
oh ok
Also, if you look at it, one of the angles of the parallelogram is right, but it is not a square, therefore, it must be a...?
parallelogram
no rectangle
Yeah, it's a rectangle.
okay and number 15
All sides are congruent. It must at least be a...?
rectangle
Rhombus, it must least be a rhombus. Now, what we know about rhombuses, their diagonals bisect their interior angles... In particular, that 55 degrees is just half of that corner angle. Also, x is alternate interior to that 55-degree angle, so x is also 55 degrees. Now, we know one corner, as well as its opposite, measure twice 55, and that's 110 degrees apiece. Quadrilaterals have interior angles that measure 360 degrees, so y, as well as its opposite which also measures y degrees, so you get 110 + 110 + y + y = 360 2y + 220 = 360 2y = 140 y = 70
Now, it's a rhombus, but the corners are not right angles, so it's not a square, it's just a rhombus.
oh ok
thank you so much i get it
No problem Terence out :)
ok
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!