Having some conceptual trouble with this problem: "A falling object travels one-fourth of its total distance in the last second of its fall. What height was it dropped from?" Would someone please help me set this one up?
So suppose the object is dropped from rest at a height of h. You know that h = (1/2)gT^2, from basic kinematics (yes?). T is the time for the object to reach the zero mark and T is the time taken; g the acceleration due to gravity. Now, the new information you are given in the problem is that the distance travelled in the last second is h/4. What is that distance travelled in the last second? Well, at time t = T-1, the object has falled a distance of d1 = (1/2)g(T-1)^2. At time t = T, we know the distance travelled is d2 = (1/2)gT^2 = h. Hence in the last second, the object has travelled a distance of d2 - d1 = h - (1/2)g(T-1)^2 and you know that is equal to h/4 You will now have to manipulate these equations to eliminate T from them in order to express h purely in terms of g.
...or solve for T in terms of g. Either way!
I'm with you so far... do I eliminate T by using some other form of T?
Well, play around with it and see what you can do. I think I would take this last expression h - (1/2)g(T-1)^2 and set it equal to h/4 and see what that tells me about T. Remember that we can also write h = (1/2)gT^2
Oh, I see! By the time h/4 = h - (1/2)g(T-1)^2 is solved for T, I'll have a new expression to plug in for T.
Yes
Thanks so much. That cleared it right up :)
What answer do you get for h in terms of g?
Actually... I've tried it a few different ways now and something still seems wrong. What you're saying makes sense, but I'm getting just strange answers, like t = sqrt(h/10g)... where did I go wrong?
Or \[{3h \over g }=t^2+2t-1\]
Yes, I think you get a quadratic expression. The answer isn't so neat and elegant.
Be careful with signs btw.
Orginally I got \[-{3h \over g} = -t^2-2t+1\] Should I leave it like that?
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!