Show that if we replace x by [λ-(a/3)] and simplify, we end up with an equation that doesn't have a λ^2 term - that is, an equation in the form λ^3+pλ+q=0 (Given the general cubic equation with rational coefficients: x^3 + ax^2 + bx + c)
Plug that term in for x in all those places and show what you get
i got this when i expanded it all
Okay now combine like terms
but i found nothing to combine
You should recheck your expansion then because a lot of that should clear out
can you help me i dont know what i did wrong
It looks ok, as far as you went.
the 2nd and 3rd terms combine. there are others. match exponents on lambda and a
ohhhhh wow im silly. i totally overlooked some of them. thank you!
and I assume you will fix your bx (you changed a lambda into an x)
yeah
and you should write \[ -2a \lambda \frac{a}{3} \] as \[ -2 \lambda \frac{a^2}{3} \] so it's easier to find matching terms
this is what i simplified so far... im not sure what to do about the b and the ab terms though or maybe i made a mistake before?
you should group them in powers of lambda so that you match the coefficients with λ^3+pλ+q=0 in other words, p and q are going to be some ugly combinations of a and b
your -a^2 λ should be divided by 3 ? also, you are missing the C term and the sign on bλ should be + ?
thanks for those catches! i got down to this, does it seem to be correct?
you want 27 C/27 and I got (3b-a^2)/3 for p
though looking at it more carefully, your q is OK. (but I still would put 27C / 27 rather than have c dangling off to the side.)
ok thank you so much for all your help!
but how do you get (3b-a^2)/3 ... i can only get it with +
oh never mind i got it
Would you be able to help me with another problem that's related to this one?
yep
using the procedure from part 1, depress the equation x^3+6x^2+9x+4=0
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!