Ask your own question, for FREE!
Mathematics 9 Online
OpenStudy (chihiroasleaf):

Prove that if we select 101 integers from the set S = {1,23, ..., 200}, there exist m, n in the selection where gcd(m,n) = 1 It's about Pigeonhole principle, but I really have no idea how to start? any hint? :)

OpenStudy (perl):

are you missing a comma? should be gcd (m,n) = 1

OpenStudy (perl):

if you pick two multiples of 2, then gcd (m,n) is not 1 if you pick two multiples of 3 , same deal

OpenStudy (perl):

so in the worst case scenario, imagine you picked all multiples of some number , try to imagine that (its horrible)

OpenStudy (chihiroasleaf):

yes.. it should be gcd(m,n)..., I've revised it...

OpenStudy (perl):

so for instance, suppose you picked { 2,4,6,8,10,12.....198,200 } any two numbers in this set , gcd (m,n) is not 1. can be 2 or greater

OpenStudy (perl):

this is the worst case scenario, do you see why? what if you picked {3,6,9,12,15,...198} , but thats not 101 numbers thats like not even close, maybe 66 numbers

OpenStudy (perl):

hello?

OpenStudy (chihiroasleaf):

the member of the set {2,4,6,8,...,200} and {3,6,...,198} are not 101,

OpenStudy (chihiroasleaf):

I can't get your point... :(

OpenStudy (perl):

any time you have a set of multiples the gcd will not be 1. so you have to show you have in your set two numbers which are not multiples of each other

OpenStudy (perl):

{2,4,6,8...200} has 100 numbers, and that means if you add 1 more number, it cannot be a multiple of 2 . That number whatever it is , will be relatively prime. QED

OpenStudy (chihiroasleaf):

hhmm.. I see..., thank you... :)

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!