product of all factors of number N is equal to tenth power of the number . then N cant be divisible by 90 , 200 , 126 or 210?
We need to prove it ?
i give 4 numbers, you have to choose the correct option. basically the question is: product of all factors of number N is equal to tenth power of the number . then N cant be divisible by a. 90 b. 200 c. 126 d. 210
Is the ans 210 ?
By my work, my best bet will be 210
well i dont have the solutions right now but i too got 210 by looking at its factor. how did you get it?
Let N be non perfect square. Let there be m factors of N, then product of all factors of N = N^(m/2) We are given N^(m/2) = N^10 hence m=20 factoring 20 -> (1*20) = (2*10) = (4*5) = (2*2*5) There can thus be max 3 prime factors of N Only 210 has 4 prime factors, rest all have 3 . And hence the asn
why is N= N^(m/2) and how do you know N is a non perfect square
im going to bed i will see you tomorrow
It is n^10 = n^(m/2)
where does m come from?
please explain more , thanks
And Its and assumption, you'll have to take another case where N is a perfect sq.
an*
Lets take an example, say 20
factors = 1,2,4,5,10,20
product = (1*20) * (2*10) * (4*5)
there are more, 8,
oh woops
60 is such a number... as long as factors don't include the number itself.
oh woops
so product = 20^3 = 20^(6/2)
Whats with "woops" today? o.O
Too impulsive... working on a solution :P
So N^(m/2) is clear ?
Trying a different approach... hang on.
this is true for all numbers?
Which are not squares.
Alternatively, all sq. no. have odd no. of factors, otherwise, all other nos. have even no. of factors.
So 2 of those factors will always multiply together to give N. No. of pairs = m/2 Hence product = N^(m/2)
thats not a rigorous argument, but ok, i guess this just popped up
What do you mean by not a rigorous argument ?
doing one example doesnt mean its true for all non perfect squares
Lets try to generalize.
Let factors of N be p1, p2,p3 .. pm (i.e. m factors)
Where p1<p2<p3..<pm
p1 * pm = N
None of which are 1 or N, right? You can be specific and let there be 2k factors, but
p2 * pm-1 = N
Nopes. 1 and N included.
If we exclude both, product will be N^(m-2)/2
well, fine, but you can be specific and make it so that they are p1, p2,p3... pk, And then the rest are N/p1,N/p2,...N/pk Like that
ok i think I see what you did
Glad you do.
(2^0 * 5^0) * (2^2 * 5^1 (2^1 *5^0) * ( 2^1 * 5^1) ...
?
how do you find N
We don;t have to find N, where did I find N
you wrote There can thus be max 3 prime factors of N Only 210 has 4 prime factors, rest all have 3 .
how did you reason that there can be max 3 prime factors
Yes. m =20 , i.e. N has total 20 no. of factors.
20 can be written as 1*20 2*10 4*5
or 2*2*5
Before this, you should be knowing that , say n = x^p . y^q . z^r , where x,y,z are prime nos, then total factors of n are (p+1)(q+1)(r+1)
im not sure what they are asking. you didnt find N
terenz, what are they asking?
Something tells me I should stay out of this, but it's only asking which of those four numbers cannot divide N.
We are not supposed to find N, we are supposed to find which of the following (90,126,210,200) is not a factor of N
ok
Are you following till now ?
Do you know about no. of factors thing ? Like I just said , (p+1)(q+1)(r+1) ?
now sure how you got that
hmmm..
nevermind, i see that
thats just using number of choices
you sure?
Yep.
yeah, im lost on the other stuff
so we deduced that N has 20 factors, because N=N^(m/2) = N^(10) ---> m /2 = 10 , m = 20
yes.
20 must be of the form of (p+1)(q+1)(r+1)(s+1) ...
Where p,q,r,s.. are all natural numbers.
N = x^p . y^q . z^r *... 20 = (p+1)(q+1)(r+1) ... ok
We also know 20 = 1*20 = 2*10 = 4*5 = 2*2*5 Not any more combos possible right ?
right
Lets sat p<=q<=r<=s... On comparison, p can be 0 and then q = 19 (for 1*20) p can be 1, and q = 9 ( for 2*10) p can be 3 ,q=4 , (for 4*5) p can be 1, q=1 and r =2 (for 2*2*5)
Heh... I give up @shubhamsrg Your way was probably the only way that's not beyond my own capabilities... There's no need to reinvent the wheel...
hmmm. I should take that as a compliment! :P
r = 2 ?
sorry 4*
ok, now how does that help to get the conclusion
I literally made guesses on possible combinations of the first three prime numbers (my rationale was that 3 is the greatest natural number where 3! < 10) And figured out (experimentally, not logically) that (p+1)(q+1)(r+1) thing @shubhamsrg had already come up with earlier. I guess the least possible value for N is 240.
let me think about this and come back tomorrow you also have to look at the perfect square case?
Well, anyway, @shubhamsrg way of doing it had no flaw to it that I could spot, but apparently just needed more explaining :P
Now we know N = x^p . y^q . z^r there is no possibility of a "s"
Hence N can only we represented in terms of 3 prime factors. only 210 is the one which can not be represented by 3 prime numbers
@perl Cannot be a perfect square if you accept that N=(x^p)(y^q)(z^r) As that would imply that p,q, and r are all even, implying (p+1)(q+1)(r+1) = 20 to be odd, a contradiction.
If we assume N is perfect sq, then product of factors will be N^((m+1)/2) => m=19 19 = 1*19 only hence N = x^18 (only) Hope you can make out where this will go.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!