Find the indefinite integral
\[\int\limits_{?}^{?} 2\frac{ x^{2} }{ \sqrt[3]{x^{3}+2} } dx\]
I am assuming I use substitution.
i would let u = x^3 +2
can i take my 2 out?
then it follows du = 3x^2dx
yes, definitely factor out the constant (2)
so du=3x^{2} dx?
sure does
what does your integral expression look like now
\[2\int\limits_{?}^{?}\frac{ x^{2} }{ u^\frac{ 1 }{ 3 } }\]
I took a little different path. note that du / 3 = x^2dx so I got: \[2/3\int\limits_{}^{}u^(-2/3)\]
that should be u^(-2/3)
how does du/3=x^2 dx?
du = 3x^2dx --- Divide both sides by 3 du / 3 = x^2dx
why would i want to know du/3
because now you can divide your constant by 3. du = 3x^2dx has a constant in it which would just get in the way.
Keep your terms simple, and get rid of constants when you can
where does the 3 come from?
(basically why I got 2/3 on the outside)
oh i see where the 3 comes from.
the derivative of x^3 is 3x^2, that is where the 3 comes from initially.
so when i do these types of problems and there is a constant in my du value, i should divide by that constant?
yes, if you have something like du = (constant)x^3/sin^2(x)/cos(x)/etcdx just divide the constant out so you get du / constant = simplified-x-term-dx
\[2/3\int\limits_{?}^{?}\frac{ 2x }{ (x^{3}+2)^{2/3} }\]
so the du/3=x^2 dx goes in place of du then?
notice x^2dx = du so we can just substitute for that so you have 2/3 (integral sign) u^(-2/3) du u^(-2/3) is the same as 1 / u(2/3) --- I just moved the u up to the numerator.
1/ u^(2/3) ***
so the du/3=x^2 dx goes in place of du then?
like du/3 is the same thing as du now?
other way around, du goes in the place of the x^2
du/3 is the same as x^2dx which is what we had in the numerator, so we can just place the numerator with du
replace*
du / 3 is du because we already divided by 3 on the outside
im just a little confused as to where the 3 actually fits in the calculations. like, when i sub in du i place x^2 dx even though that's what we found for du/3
so because we divided by 3, when i take it outside the integrel is becomes 1/3
2/3 because you still have the first 2 you took out
you're basically multiplying it the outside by 1/3, you're just moving the du inside the integral now.
was the answer i wrote above correct?
no, you do not need 2x on the top. we only took the derivative of what we substituted originally which was x^3 +2
we need x^2 on the top so that we CAN substitute du for it. that's the whole point of integration by substitution
so its 2/3 int 1/(x^3+2)^2/3 x^2 dx?
before we substitute x^2 for du, the integral looks like 2/3 (integral sign) x^2 / (x^3 +2)^(2/3) dx but we know x^2dx = du so substitute du for x^2 and u for (x^3+2) 2 / 3 (integral sign) du / (u)^(2/3 = 2/3 (integral sign) u^(-2/3)du
still confused?
yup thats what i got.
good job!
can you solve from there?
well shouldnt it be to the power of 1/3 not 2/3?
since it was the cubed root
-1/3 you're right, it wouldnt be to the -2/3
(negative because im speaking in terms of moving everything up to the numerator. it would be positive in the denominator)
when you have 2/ 3 (Integral sign) du / CubedRoot[u] and you evaluate the integral, then it becomes u^(2/3) + C that's where I was confusing myself.
Then just substitute back for u, and you should be good!
got it! would you be able to help me with another?
I've got about 20 minutes. let's see how much we can get done!
int 3x cos(1-x^2) dx. i got u=cos(1-x^2) and du=2xsin(x^2) dx
I would let u = 1-x^2 when you use substitution, generally don't include things like cos/ln/log/sin etc
okay i find this one confusing due to the 3x in there
Also, factor out that 3 so you get 3 (integral sign) xcos(1-x^2)
okay then i found du=2x dx
you should get du = -2xdx
thats what i meant
if you were finding the derivative of 1 + x^2, then it would be du = 2xdx, but since it is minus, the derivative is du = -2xdx
yah i know thats what i meant to write/
okay, then apply the same trick as last time -du/2 = xdx
what does the integral become now?
3 int x cos(1-x^2) x dx?
-3/2 on the outside -3/2 (integral sign) cos(u) du remember we found du = xdx, so just replace the x with du the -1/2 goes to the outside.
all that came from -du / 2 = xdx and the cos(u) came from substituting u, with (1-x^2)
substituting (1-x^2) with u rather
i get confused at the du/2 part when i sub it back into the equation .. so now i replace the x that was in front of cos with du?
yup, that's exactly what we did when we had x^2dx = du /3 in the last equation. when you have something like du / x ALWAYS put x under what you have already on the outside (in this case it's 3) Also because it was - du / 2 put that NEGATIVE sign outside as well (which is why we get -3/2 on the outside After you've done that you're just left with du and du = xdx so replace the x in the equation with du!
I'm sorry, but i have to go -3/2 (integral sign) cos(u)du integrating that gives you (-3sin(u)) / (2) + C = -3/2 * sin(1 - x^2) + C Good luck!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!