Finding the determinant of the matrix---a system of vectors.
Let me type it..
U=2i+3j+2k V=-2i+4j-k W=3i+3k 1. find det. by hand 2. Find values of U, X, and W 3. Explain the orientation of this vector (UXW) in terms of U and V.
ok, so I need to make in Matrix form. Then I can use a general formula I was given. AEI-AHF-BDI+BGF+CDH-CGE. But do I put a 0 in the place of the J for vector w?
If you know the law of Sarrus, you can evaluate the determinant of this 3x3 Matrix that way.
yes you put a 0 there. The "redundant" equation for W is: \[\Large w=3i+0j+3k \]
Perfect.
And yes, I do know and will use that law.
Thanks for that. But what in the world are steps 2 and 3 asking?
They probably want you to try and setup a 3x3 system and solve for u,v,w.
like express one in terms of another, this is how I would judge that. For c I am unsure myself, if the determinant is not equal to zero, that means that the vectors aren't linearly depending, that would kind of disassociate with that problem.
True. I guess I just need to work step one. I will tag you when I get it done, I need to step away from my desk for a minute. Thanks.
No problem.
@Spacelimbus the det of the matrix is 9.
@Spacelimbus
true
geometrically that means that the vectors are linearly independent, therefore none of the above given vectors is redundant.
Now I need the values of U, V, and w.
2. Find values of U, X, and W It says U, X and W. Not U, V and W.
Wait, the top of this post does say u, v, and w.
U=2i+3j+2k V=-2i+4j-k W=3i+3k 1. find det. by hand 2. Find values of U, X, and W 3. Explain the orientation of this vector (UXW) in terms of U and V. This? I copy pasted that from the top. Or you mean on your paper?
right, of that from the top I need to find what U, V, and W are.
and to be honest with you, I haven't seen such a question before myself, have you done something similar to that? These are vectors, a vector has three properties: Magnitude(Length), Direction and Orientation. I don't think that it makes sense to ask for a value of a vector, especially because they mention the plural form "values" which indicates to me that there are many. Of course, we could always scale the vector - but that makes no sense to me as well. Maybe someone else can help here, I don't understand what they're asking for.
I agree, but at this point I guess i just want to find U V and W regardless. U=2i+3j+2k V=-2i+4j-k W=3i+3k But I forgot how.
I opened a new ?.
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!