Please help///;
Suppose the slope of line AB is greater than 0 and less than 1. What inequality represents the slope of a line perpendicular to line AB? (Hint: This part of the question has one right answer.) Give an example of the slopes for a pair of lines that would satisfy both inequalities. (Many examples are possible.)
For perpendicular lines, with slope m1 and m2, \[m _{2} = -\frac{ 1 }{ m _{1} }\]
1 divided by a number less than 1, is always greater than 1. Thus, -1 divided by a number less than 1, is always less than -1.
0<AB<1 then the perpendicular would be -infinity<line<-1 I think
eg 1/0.25 = 4 and -1/0,25 = -4 so \[m _{2} < -1 \]
No.. to the person who... asked the question :P Give an example of the slopes for a pair of lines that would satisfy both inequalities. Pick any number between 0 and 1 for slope m1. Then find m2 from the formula above.
im so confused...
pick a number between 0 & 1 say, 0.5
okay..
If that is the slope of AB we'll label that \[m_1=0.5\]
alright.
now, the formula: \[m_2=-\frac{ 1 }{ m_1 }\]
so, -1/0.5 is -2
right,
so if you keep doing that, you'll notice a pattern
that the slope of the line perpendicular is always going to be more than negative infinity but less than -1
you can try with a really small number like: 0.0000001 and the perpendicular line would be: -10000000
the line will always be: \[-\infty<x<-1\] x being the slope of the line
@Chelsea04 I don't think you need to add the neg. infinity. x < -1 is the same thing.
RIGHT YOU ARE!!! WHOOPS!!! MY BAD!!!
I'm thinking of other stuff, like writing it in the interval thing @agent0smith xϵ(−∞,−1]
No worries :) it's not like it's incorrect anyway, it's just kinda implied that x is greater than neg. infinity, so no need to write it there.
Yea, I'm aware :) thank-you for that :)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!