Theoreticals of Calculus: Let R be the relation on N(atural numbers) given by xRy iff x divides y.
The answer is in the pdf pg 10. number 6.11 a)
The question is asking if it is symmetric and or reflexive
i understand why it is reflexive but why not symmetric? i thought the question was saying the relation is only if x and y can divide with each other, not that they are equal to the same value
to be symmetric means: \[a\div b ~therefore~b\div a \] right?
yes
can you think of 2 natural numbers x,y such that: \[x\div y\ne y\div x\]
well if x = 1 and y = 2, but the way the question was worded, i was thinking that they don't have to equal each other, they just have to be able to divide and become a rational number. is the x --> y then y --> x mean that both answers are the same or equal?
the not equals sign is prolly a bad choice
the relation is on the natural set, not the rational set right? or am i seeing that off?
your right, oh so that means that the numbers inputted and outputted must be natural numbers
i believe so, im not up to par on the terminology tho -- that "relation on N" part :) i do believe it means that we have to be closed under the operation tho
oh ok, so why is there the transitive property which states that "if xRy and yRz, then xRz"?
oh do you know for sure it has transitive property?
if y|x, then for some integer n; x = yn
if y|x and z|y then x = yn y = zm x = z(mn); therefore z|x is transitive
hmm ok that makes sense! Thank you ^_^
yore welcome, good luck :)
thanks!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!