A stuntman falls from a hot-air balloon that is hovering at a constant altitude, 100 ft above a lake. A television camera on shore, 200 ft from a point directly below the balloon, follows his descent. At what rate is the angle of elevation, theta, of the camera changing 2 seconds after the stuntman falls? (Neglect the height of the camera.)
\[ \tan(\theta) = y/x \] Implicitly differentiate with respect to \(t\). What equation do you get?
This?\[\sec ^{2}\theta \frac{ d \theta }{ dt } =\frac{ \frac{ dy }{ dt } }{ \frac{ dx }{ dt } }\]
You'd have to use the quotient rule actually.
\[ (y/x)' = \frac{y'x-yx'}{x^2} \]
so then...\[\sec ^{2}\theta \frac{ d \theta }{ dt }=\frac{ \frac{ dy }{ dt }x-y \frac{ dx }{ dt } }{ x ^{2} }\]
Yeah, now since \(x\) is constant with respect to time, we know \(x'=0\).
Also, since \(x = \cos\theta\) we know \(\sec^2\theta = x^{-2}\).
This will simplify things quite a bit.
why is x=cosθ?
Ooops. I meant to say the \(z\cos\theta =x\) where \(z\) is the hypotenuse.
oh okay
So \(\sec^2\theta = z^2/x^2\)
\( z^2/x^2 =( y^2+x^2)/x^2\)
What equation are you ending up with for \(\theta'\)?
\[\frac{ d \theta }{ dt }=\frac{ \frac{ dy }{ dt }x }{ (y ^{2}+x ^{2}) }\]
Yeah. Now you are given y and x, all you need is y'
the gravitational constant -32.174ft/sec^2?
That's acceleration.
You want speed.
do you mean velocity such as taking the integral of 32.174ft/sec^2 and coming up with -32.174t ft/sec
\[ y' = \int_0^2y''dt \]In this case, \(y''\) is the acceleration due to gravity.
so 64.384
Yeah. Now you can solve for \(\theta'\)
I mean you have everything you need now, since: \[ \theta' = \frac{y'x}{x^2+y^2} \]
so...\[\frac{ d \theta }{ dt }=\frac{ 12869.6 }{ 50000 } = 0.257392\]
or no I forgot the negative sign y'=-64.348 so... it should be -0.257392 correct?
It's in radians, I believe.
yes rads
but otherwise the answer is: The rate of change in the angle of the camera at 2 seconds after the stuntman jumps is -0.257392rads correct?
You could try differentiating: \[ z\sin\theta = y \]to see if the answer is consistent.
actually that would be a bit complicated.
yes it seems like it would be :-)
Wait, actually there might be a problem with the answer you got.
We should probably use \(y(t=2)\) rather than \(y(t=0)\).
Why is that?
Because \(y=y(t)\) and we overlooked that fact.
It's a function of \(t\) and we set \(t=2\).
\[ \int_0^2y'dt = y(2)-y(0)\implies y(2) = \int_0^2y'dt + y(0) \]
This time though the integrand (\(y'\) ) is not constant. \[ y'(t) = y''\cdot t= -32.174t \]
Sorry I didn't notice that at first.
how is y'(t)=y'' * t =-32.174t?
it it because V=gt? where g=gravitational acceleration and t=time?
Okay so basically....\[ \int_0^u y''dt = y'(u) - y'(0) \]By the fundamental theorem of calculus (\(u\) is just a dummy variable). At the start, the velocity is 0, so \[ y(u) = \int_0^u y''dt = -32.174\int_0^udt =-32.174 \left[t \bigg|_0^u \right] = -32.174u \]
Replacing \(t\) back into \(u\): \[ y'(t) = -32.174t \]
Likewise: \[ y(2) -y(0)= \int_0^2 y'' dt \implies y(2) - 100 = \int^2_0 -32.174tdt \]
The whole \(v=gt\) comes from calculus.
The derived formula are fine if you remember the preconditions for them, otherwise just use the definitions to get things done.
In math section, I avoid the derived formula and use mainly definitions / laws / principles.
got it
so it should be:\[\frac{ d \theta }{ dt }=\frac{ -32.174t*200 }{10000+40000 }\]
No, you never solved for \(y(2)\)
\[ \frac{d\theta}{dt}(2) = \frac{\frac{dy}{dt}(2)\cdot x(2)}{[y(2)]^2+[x(2)]^2} \]
y(2)=-16.087t^2
You are evaluating when \(t=2\), there should be no \(t\)s left.
A definite integral always returns a number that is constant
so y(2)=-64.384
oh -64.348
You're saying they're underground? That makes no sense.
\[ y(2) -y(0)= \int_0^2 y'' dt \implies y(2) - 100 = \int^2_0 -32.174tdt \]
\[ y(2) = 100 + -32.174\left[ \frac{t^2}{2}\bigg|_0^2\right] \]
if y'=y''*t or -32.174t the integral of y' with limits of integration of [0,2] is -16.087{(2)^2}or -64.348
Yeah but you are forgetting that \(y(0) \neq 0 \)
it is = 100
Yeah.
so y(2) = 35.652
Now that makes sense.
so....\[\frac{ d \theta }{ dt }=\frac{ -64.348(200) }{ (35.653)^{2}+40000 }\]
so then θ' is -0.3118305217588708 or in answer form decreasing at a rate of 0.3118305217588708rads
Yeah that looks right.
okay, now I'm going to try and figure out were I went wrong the first time I tried to solve this. Thank you so much for your help :-)
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!