surface area of revolution y=sinpix on x=0 to x=1.
\[y=sinpix \]
f'x=(cospix)pi
\[2\Pi \int\limits_{0}^{1}\sin Pix(\sqrt{1+(picospix)^2}\]
I could be mistaken, but that last integral looks to me like what I would use for arc length. I thought for area we would integrate pi(r)^2, and in your case it looks like r is sin(pix).
So if I am right, then you would have to square sin(pix) before integrating it. you'd have to check, but I suspect there is probably a helpful identity you could sub in for sin^2(pix)
finding surface area of revolution involes arc length integral
Arc length in 2D is very much associated with Surface Area in 3D. The two integrals should have obvious similarities.
looks like i missed the surface area part, my mistake.
Still doesn't look right.
What formula is being used?
\[ 2\pi r \]Takes the radius and gives your circumference. Arc length isn't the radius.
\[\int\limits_{a}^{b}2\pi(fx)\sqrt{1+[f'(x)]^2}\]
this equation has been getting me the right answers so far
It is correct. It was also correct up at the top. Why did you give up on it?
not entirely sure how to square picospix, then i have to add 1 to it, then i have to to take square root. how do i go about doing that
is picospix squared = pi^2cos^2(pix)?
yh, looks like it is, just chcked in calc
That is fine. Don't worry about the square root. It will not bother you. Try substituting \(u = \cos(\pi x)\)
let u = cospix du = sinpixdx \[\int\limits_{a}^{b}du \sqrt{1+\pi^2u^2}\]
whoops, forgot the chain rule taking the derivative
Missing a few parts, there. \(du = -\pi\sin(\pi x)\;dx\)
let u=cospix du=-pisinpix -du/pi=sinpix \[-1/\pi \int\limits_{a}^{b}du \sqrt{1+\pi^2u^2}\]
@tkhunny how about now? :p
I'm definitely in over my head, but that looks a little bit now like it meets sqrt(a^2 + x^2) for a trig substitution
Well, it's still not pretty, but you should be able to wade through it to a complete resolution. Save a whole sheet of paper for the details. :-)
it still looks completely un do able to me to l0l. and yeah, i think it might be a trig subsitution, but not entirely sure how i would go about do that
It was trig when we started. You might want to back up and try a different substitution. If all else fails, you can try Weierstrass - annoying, but it works.
even if i let u=sinx, i just end up with another problem with a bunch of u's and pi's that i dont know what to do with lol. guess i'll just move to another problem for now
thanks anyways though
let u =sinpix* is what i meant
Yea, it's not pretty, but it can be done. Good work this far and good luck on the rest!
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!