Rectangle R has varying length l and width w but a constant perimeter of 4 ft. For what values of l and w will the area of R be greatest? Give an algebraic argument. Give a geometric arguement
Let W = width Let L = length The perimeter, P, is a constant, but L and W are varables. P = 2L + 2W A = LW Since we want the area to be the greatest, we write the area in terms of W and L, our variables. P = 2L + 2W 2L = P - 2W L = P/2 - W Substitute L into A: A = LW A = (P/2 - W)W A = WP/2 - W^2 Now you have the area expressed as a function of the width and the perimeter. The primeter is just a constant, but the width is a variable. A function of the form y = -x^2 - kx (where k is just a number) is a parabola that opens downward. Therefore it has a maximum value. Our expression for the area of the rectangle is A = -W^2 - WP/2 which is of the same form. We see from this that its graph is a parabloa that opens downward. The maximum value corresponds to the maximum area of the rectangle.
Is this the answer or do I need to name values?
This is not the answer yet, but there won't be values because you don't have a value for the perimeter.
Well, there was another question before this because this was a two part question but I didn't undertsand this part
@mathstudent55
The last step here on the algebraic side is to find what value of W will produce the greatest area. That happens at W = -P/4. Now you need to plug in -P/4 into the Area equation to get the maximum area.
Okay, would it be \[A=\frac{ 3P ^{2} }{ 16 } ?\]
I got A = P^2/16
Do you want to see what I did?
|dw:1361827601231:dw|
Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!