Ask your own question, for FREE!
Statistics 7 Online
OpenStudy (hba):

Stats help required

OpenStudy (hba):

OpenStudy (hba):

Actually i know. \[Mean=\sum_{}^{}fx/\sum_{}^{}f\] I know, \[\sum_{}^{}f=2000\]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

do you have the answer key is the answer 7.975 ???

OpenStudy (hba):

I also think that is the answer as i tried doing it.

OpenStudy (hba):

But here x1,x2,x3 cannot be 8.5,7.5 and 8 because it is actually the mean

OpenStudy (hba):

As mentioned in the ques

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay give me a second.

OpenStudy (hba):

Sure

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Now suppose that we call \[ \sum fx \]The 'total'

OpenStudy (anonymous):

We want the 'total' of each sub population.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Then we can add them

OpenStudy (anonymous):

To get the 'total' of the whole population.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

From there we can find the mean of the whole population.

Parth (parthkohli):

We know that the sum is \(700 \times 8.5 + 800 \times 7.5 + 500 \times 8\)

OpenStudy (hba):

No No No 8.5,7.5 and 8 cannot be x

OpenStudy (hba):

They are the means

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Yeah, but he's not using that formula.

Parth (parthkohli):

Since mean is sum of observations divided by number of observations, we know that the sum of observations multiplied by the number of observations is the sum of observations.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

He using this: \[ \sum fx = \frac{\sum fx}{\sum f}\times \sum f \]

Parth (parthkohli):

Can you continue from this point?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

i don't think there is any problem with taking them as x's . what you alreadyy did is correct 7.975 .

Parth (parthkohli):

lunch... g2g

OpenStudy (hba):

But how can you say mean of x is actually x?

OpenStudy (anonymous):

(8.5*700 + 800*7.5 + 500*8)/2000

OpenStudy (anonymous):

these are different random variables for the whole population . you can just use them in the formula .

OpenStudy (hba):

@wio Please justify

OpenStudy (hba):

It says that it is the mean @sami-21

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Okay so if you have three means... suppose they are \(m_1, m_2, m_3\)

OpenStudy (anonymous):

\[ m_1 = \frac{\sum_1fx}{\sum_1f} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

yes it does says . and requires the mean for population . which should be taking the means of the sub populatiions .

OpenStudy (hba):

One more thing,If that is not the formula,What is it?

OpenStudy (hba):

@xoya Shu away

OpenStudy (anonymous):

the mean of all three will be: \[ m_4 = \frac{\sum_4 fx}{\sum_4x} = \frac{\sum_1 fx + \sum_2 fx+ \sum_3 fx}{\sum_1 f + \sum_2 f + \sum_3 f} \]

OpenStudy (anonymous):

This is because the total frequency \(\sum_4 f\) is the sum of the sub frequencies. The total weight \(\sum_4 fx\) is equal to the sum of all the weights.

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Notice how \[ m_1 = \frac{\sum_1 fx}{\sum_1 f} \implies m_1\sum_1 f = \sum_1 f x \]

OpenStudy (hba):

Okay so what would the formula basically?

OpenStudy (hba):

be*

OpenStudy (anonymous):

Given means... \(m_1, m_2, \dots \) with total frequencies \(f_1,f_2,...\) then the mean of the totals is: \[ \frac{\sum m_if_i}{\sum f_i} \]

OpenStudy (hba):

Thanks a lot :D :D

OpenStudy (anonymous):

It's not the same formula, they just happen to be the same though by coincidence.

OpenStudy (hba):

I see.

Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!
Can't find your answer? Make a FREE account and ask your own questions, OR help others and earn volunteer hours!

Join our real-time social learning platform and learn together with your friends!